東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Optimization of procedures for oil e...

Amusan, Anuoluwapo Ruth.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Optimization of procedures for oil extraction from animal tissue .

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Optimization of procedures for oil extraction from animal tissue ./
Author:	Amusan, Anuoluwapo Ruth.
Description:	101 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-04, page: 2066.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International48-04.
Subject:	Agriculture, Food Science and Technology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR56804
ISBN:	9780494568040

Optimization of procedures for oil extraction from animal tissue .
Amusan, Anuoluwapo Ruth.

Optimization of procedures for oil extraction from animal tissue . - 101 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-04, page: 2066.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--McGill University (Canada), 2009.

Oil was extracted from chicken and pork fat discards by microwave assisted extraction and soxhlet extraction for comparison. Protease enzyme and pulsed electric field were used as a pretreatment prior to extraction by either soxhlet or microwave assisted extraction by hexane. Conditions for both the enzyme pretreatment and the microwave extraction were optimized for the extraction of the oils from the discards. The fat discards were pretreated with papain enzyme in a phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0) and incubated at 45°C in a water bath and incubated at various time intervals (30 min, 1 h, 2 h and 3 h). Enzyme pretreatment at 2 h produced the highest oil yield increase of 20.1% when compared to the control samples (P=0.0003) in chicken samples and an oil yield increase of 16.6% in comparison to control samples (P=0.0179) in pork samples. There was a decrease in oil yield at 3 h and no significant difference in oil yield when compared to control in both chicken samples (P=0.217) and pork samples (P=1.0000). Optimization of microwave assisted process shows that microwave irradiation for 7.5 min produced the best oil yield and was the most effective in oil extraction from the animal discards. There was no significant difference in oil yield produced when the irradiation time was increased to 10 min, 12.5 min, and 15min. The results obtained from optimization of microwave assisted extraction were comparable to those obtained by soxhlet extraction for 3 hr. There were significant difference between oil yield obtained from both extraction methods (P=<0.05). There were no differences in the FAME profile when compared to the literature. Pulsed electric field pretreatments were carried out on pork samples at electric field strength of 2 kV cm -1, 4 kV cm-1, 6 kV cm-1. The oil yields obtained were compared to values obtained from control samples after extraction using microwave assisted extraction for 3 min. Pulsed electric field at 4 kV cm-1 produced an oil yield increase of 6.79% and significantly different (P=0.0344) compared with control samples. There were no significant differences between oil yield at 2kV and control samples (P=1.000). At pulsed electric field strength of 6 kV cm-1 there was a decrease in oil yield. The oil yields obtained from pulsed electric field pretreament were compared with that obtained by soxhlet extraction. Pretreatment at 4kv cm-1 gave an oil yield increase of 6% (P=0.1411). The quality assessment of the oil extracted with PEF pretreated samples showed no effect of PEF on the quality of the oil. There were no significant differences in the hydroperoxide and p-anisidine values within the pretreatments and the control samples. PEF pretreatment had no effect on the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles of the oil.

ISBN: 9780494568040Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017813
Agriculture, Food Science and Technology.

Optimization of procedures for oil extraction from animal tissue .
LDR:03590nam 2200265 4500 001 1400871
005 20111015105951.5
008 130515s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494568040
035 $a (UMI)AAIMR56804
035 $a AAIMR56804
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Amusan, Anuoluwapo Ruth. $3 1679965
245 1 0 $a Optimization of procedures for oil extraction from animal tissue .
300 $a 101 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-04, page: 2066.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--McGill University (Canada), 2009.
520 $a Oil was extracted from chicken and pork fat discards by microwave assisted extraction and soxhlet extraction for comparison. Protease enzyme and pulsed electric field were used as a pretreatment prior to extraction by either soxhlet or microwave assisted extraction by hexane. Conditions for both the enzyme pretreatment and the microwave extraction were optimized for the extraction of the oils from the discards. The fat discards were pretreated with papain enzyme in a phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0) and incubated at 45°C in a water bath and incubated at various time intervals (30 min, 1 h, 2 h and 3 h). Enzyme pretreatment at 2 h produced the highest oil yield increase of 20.1% when compared to the control samples (P=0.0003) in chicken samples and an oil yield increase of 16.6% in comparison to control samples (P=0.0179) in pork samples. There was a decrease in oil yield at 3 h and no significant difference in oil yield when compared to control in both chicken samples (P=0.217) and pork samples (P=1.0000). Optimization of microwave assisted process shows that microwave irradiation for 7.5 min produced the best oil yield and was the most effective in oil extraction from the animal discards. There was no significant difference in oil yield produced when the irradiation time was increased to 10 min, 12.5 min, and 15min. The results obtained from optimization of microwave assisted extraction were comparable to those obtained by soxhlet extraction for 3 hr. There were significant difference between oil yield obtained from both extraction methods (P=<0.05). There were no differences in the FAME profile when compared to the literature. Pulsed electric field pretreatments were carried out on pork samples at electric field strength of 2 kV cm -1, 4 kV cm-1, 6 kV cm-1. The oil yields obtained were compared to values obtained from control samples after extraction using microwave assisted extraction for 3 min. Pulsed electric field at 4 kV cm-1 produced an oil yield increase of 6.79% and significantly different (P=0.0344) compared with control samples. There were no significant differences between oil yield at 2kV and control samples (P=1.000). At pulsed electric field strength of 6 kV cm-1 there was a decrease in oil yield. The oil yields obtained from pulsed electric field pretreament were compared with that obtained by soxhlet extraction. Pretreatment at 4kv cm-1 gave an oil yield increase of 6% (P=0.1411). The quality assessment of the oil extracted with PEF pretreated samples showed no effect of PEF on the quality of the oil. There were no significant differences in the hydroperoxide and p-anisidine values within the pretreatments and the control samples. PEF pretreatment had no effect on the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles of the oil.
590 $a School code: 0781.
650 4 $a Agriculture, Food Science and Technology. $3 1017813
650 4 $a Engineering, Agricultural. $3 1019504
650 4 $a Chemistry, Agricultural. $3 1021829
690 $a 0359
690 $a 0539
690 $a 0749
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $3 1018122
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 48-04.
790 $a 0781
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR56804