東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The aid for security dilemma: The di...

Mahanty, Daniel R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The aid for security dilemma: The distortive impact of U.S. national security interests on development assistance.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The aid for security dilemma: The distortive impact of U.S. national security interests on development assistance./
作者:	Mahanty, Daniel R.
面頁冊數:	55 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-02, page: 0898.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International49-02.
標題:	Middle Eastern Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1483131
ISBN:	9781124348100

The aid for security dilemma: The distortive impact of U.S. national security interests on development assistance.
Mahanty, Daniel R.

The aid for security dilemma: The distortive impact of U.S. national security interests on development assistance. - 55 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-02, page: 0898.

Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2010.

The goal of U.S. Official Development Assistance in the context of national security policy has changed in many ways since 9/11, but in no way more important than a shift from "strategic bribery" to "development outcomes". The conventional Cold War purpose of using development aid to secure cooperation from developing countries has been abandoned in favor of a paradigm that emphasizes and advocates aid's importance and ability in mitigating national security concerns (e.g. terrorism) that stem from poorly governed and impoverished countries. But this new paradigm exists in tension with the prevailing wisdom of modern development economics that accepts certain maxims about the importance of selectivity (i.e. selecting the right countries for aid), predictability, and political will to the effectiveness of aid. Suddenly, variables that may not matter to the Cold War policy-maker when using aid as a blunt instrument of coercion or persuasion begin to matter when using aid to achieve real development outcomes. Therefore, national security policymakers, advocating a greater emphasis on development in poorly-governed countries, may actually be championing policies that have little chance of being effective - or could even prove to be detrimental by creating unreasonable expectations among foreign audiences, creating inefficiencies, and hurting the credibility of development assistance. A brief probe of US development policy and national security interests in Yemen assesses the approach of the U.S. government to a critical partner in the War on Terror, where indicators suggest development assistance may not have much chance of sustainable outcomes. Yemen provides a compelling example of how National Security interests may make it more likely that the United States will provide aid despite poor policy environments, and could expose aid policies to problems of moral hazard and instability.

ISBN: 9781124348100Subjects--Topical Terms:

1671318
Middle Eastern Studies.

The aid for security dilemma: The distortive impact of U.S. national security interests on development assistance.
LDR:02831nam 2200289 4500 001 1400675
005 20111010080705.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124348100
035 $a (UMI)AAI1483131
035 $a AAI1483131
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Mahanty, Daniel R. $3 1679757
245 1 4 $a The aid for security dilemma: The distortive impact of U.S. national security interests on development assistance.
300 $a 55 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-02, page: 0898.
500 $a Adviser: Jennifer Sims.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2010.
520 $a The goal of U.S. Official Development Assistance in the context of national security policy has changed in many ways since 9/11, but in no way more important than a shift from "strategic bribery" to "development outcomes". The conventional Cold War purpose of using development aid to secure cooperation from developing countries has been abandoned in favor of a paradigm that emphasizes and advocates aid's importance and ability in mitigating national security concerns (e.g. terrorism) that stem from poorly governed and impoverished countries. But this new paradigm exists in tension with the prevailing wisdom of modern development economics that accepts certain maxims about the importance of selectivity (i.e. selecting the right countries for aid), predictability, and political will to the effectiveness of aid. Suddenly, variables that may not matter to the Cold War policy-maker when using aid as a blunt instrument of coercion or persuasion begin to matter when using aid to achieve real development outcomes. Therefore, national security policymakers, advocating a greater emphasis on development in poorly-governed countries, may actually be championing policies that have little chance of being effective - or could even prove to be detrimental by creating unreasonable expectations among foreign audiences, creating inefficiencies, and hurting the credibility of development assistance. A brief probe of US development policy and national security interests in Yemen assesses the approach of the U.S. government to a critical partner in the War on Terror, where indicators suggest development assistance may not have much chance of sustainable outcomes. Yemen provides a compelling example of how National Security interests may make it more likely that the United States will provide aid despite poor policy environments, and could expose aid policies to problems of moral hazard and instability.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Middle Eastern Studies. $3 1671318
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
690 $a 0555
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Security Studies. $3 1020357
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 49-02.
790 1 0 $a Sims, Jennifer, $e advisor
790 $a 0076
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1483131