東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Tackling the Anarchy Within: The Rol...

Martin-Brule, Sarah-Myriam.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Tackling the Anarchy Within: The Role of Deterrence and Great Power Intervention in Peace Operations.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Tackling the Anarchy Within: The Role of Deterrence and Great Power Intervention in Peace Operations./
作者:	Martin-Brule, Sarah-Myriam.
面頁冊數:	299 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-09, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-09A.
標題:	Peace Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR74740
ISBN:	9780494747407

Tackling the Anarchy Within: The Role of Deterrence and Great Power Intervention in Peace Operations.
Martin-Brule, Sarah-Myriam.

Tackling the Anarchy Within: The Role of Deterrence and Great Power Intervention in Peace Operations. - 299 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-09, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--McGill University (Canada), 2011.

My dissertation strives to understand the conditions under which peace operations in intra-state wars succeed or fail. I address two main questions: What is peace operation success, and what contributes to such an outcome? I define the success of a peace operation based on two dimensions: a) the accomplishment of the peace operation's mandate, and b) the establishment of order. This definition allows me to avoid a binary framework of assessment in terms of success vs. failure by introducing intermediate categories: partial failure and partial success. To explain peace operations' outcomes, I look at the role of the type of strategy adopted and the type of intervener. I suggest that the three major ingredients of any strategy are: communication, capacity and knowledge. These ingredients all interact differently depending on which strategy is adopted. I apply my theoretical framework to empirical cases, testing the saliency of my postulates by examining11 peace operations in three countries: Somalia (1991-1995), Sierra Leone (1999-2005) and Liberia (1990-2009). I assess these operations' outcomes and the processes by which they succeeded/failed at accomplishing their mandate while simultaneously contributing/hindering their chances at re-establishing order. I argue that, for a peace operation in an intra-state war, the adoption of a deterrence strategy works best for re-establishing order while the involvement of a great power facilitates the accomplishment of the mandate.

ISBN: 9780494747407Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669515
Peace Studies.

Tackling the Anarchy Within: The Role of Deterrence and Great Power Intervention in Peace Operations.
LDR:02344nam 2200265 4500 001 1400623
005 20111010080648.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494747407
035 $a (UMI)AAINR74740
035 $a AAINR74740
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Martin-Brule, Sarah-Myriam. $3 1679696
245 1 0 $a Tackling the Anarchy Within: The Role of Deterrence and Great Power Intervention in Peace Operations.
300 $a 299 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-09, Section: A, page: .
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--McGill University (Canada), 2011.
520 $a My dissertation strives to understand the conditions under which peace operations in intra-state wars succeed or fail. I address two main questions: What is peace operation success, and what contributes to such an outcome? I define the success of a peace operation based on two dimensions: a) the accomplishment of the peace operation's mandate, and b) the establishment of order. This definition allows me to avoid a binary framework of assessment in terms of success vs. failure by introducing intermediate categories: partial failure and partial success. To explain peace operations' outcomes, I look at the role of the type of strategy adopted and the type of intervener. I suggest that the three major ingredients of any strategy are: communication, capacity and knowledge. These ingredients all interact differently depending on which strategy is adopted. I apply my theoretical framework to empirical cases, testing the saliency of my postulates by examining11 peace operations in three countries: Somalia (1991-1995), Sierra Leone (1999-2005) and Liberia (1990-2009). I assess these operations' outcomes and the processes by which they succeeded/failed at accomplishing their mandate while simultaneously contributing/hindering their chances at re-establishing order. I argue that, for a peace operation in an intra-state war, the adoption of a deterrence strategy works best for re-establishing order while the involvement of a great power facilitates the accomplishment of the mandate.
590 $a School code: 0781.
650 4 $a Peace Studies. $3 1669515
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
650 4 $a Sub Saharan Africa Studies. $3 1669962
690 $a 0563
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0639
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $3 1018122
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-09A.
790 $a 0781
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR74740