東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Beating them at their own game: Coop...

Ditmer, Renae D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Beating them at their own game: Cooperating to compete in a realist world.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Beating them at their own game: Cooperating to compete in a realist world./
作者:	Ditmer, Renae D.
面頁冊數:	326 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1789.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-05A.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3398947
ISBN:	9781109734119

Beating them at their own game: Cooperating to compete in a realist world.
Ditmer, Renae D.

Beating them at their own game: Cooperating to compete in a realist world. - 326 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1789.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2010.

Remarkably, in spite of the increasing risk of an attack by a biological weapon since 1989 and extraordinary advances in bioscience and biotechnology, the BTWC remains unmodified. Unlike the other Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) agreements, thirty-five years after its entry into force, the BTWC still lacks exacting declaration and verification norms that would allow rigorous enforcement of its disarmament and nonproliferation principles. This is curious given the potentially state-breaking power of biological weapons. Equally curious is the reaction of states to this oddity. Given the 2001 Amerithrax incident, it would seem logical to for states to cooperate to strengthen the BTWC. In actuality, states are cooperatively contesting the BTWC in two ways. One, except for China, states that have WMD programs ("the haves") are cooperatively contesting the inclusion of declaration and verification norms in the BTWC. Two, states that do not have WMD programs ("the have nots") along with China are cooperatively contesting the exclusion of declaration and verification norms that would bolster the enforcement of BTWC Article X norms. Ironically, the reasons underlying both groups' contestation are how three issues---equality, equity, and equanimity---impact states' economies and their market shares in bioscience and biotechnology. To defend these conclusions, I extract and analyze quantitative and qualitative data from United Nations documents and sources. I then discusses the impact of the findings on international relations, international law, and the future of international agreements. I conclude that the future of international security agreements could be in jeopardy if policy makers do not take a more integrated, interdisciplinary approach that addresses these equality, equity, and equanimity when developing such agreements.

ISBN: 9781109734119Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Beating them at their own game: Cooperating to compete in a realist world.
LDR:02858nam 2200301 4500 001 1400433
005 20111010080547.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109734119
035 $a (UMI)AAI3398947
035 $a AAI3398947
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Ditmer, Renae D. $3 1679494
245 1 0 $a Beating them at their own game: Cooperating to compete in a realist world.
300 $a 326 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-05, Section: A, page: 1789.
500 $a Adviser: George E. Shambaugh, IV.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2010.
520 $a Remarkably, in spite of the increasing risk of an attack by a biological weapon since 1989 and extraordinary advances in bioscience and biotechnology, the BTWC remains unmodified. Unlike the other Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) agreements, thirty-five years after its entry into force, the BTWC still lacks exacting declaration and verification norms that would allow rigorous enforcement of its disarmament and nonproliferation principles. This is curious given the potentially state-breaking power of biological weapons. Equally curious is the reaction of states to this oddity. Given the 2001 Amerithrax incident, it would seem logical to for states to cooperate to strengthen the BTWC. In actuality, states are cooperatively contesting the BTWC in two ways. One, except for China, states that have WMD programs ("the haves") are cooperatively contesting the inclusion of declaration and verification norms in the BTWC. Two, states that do not have WMD programs ("the have nots") along with China are cooperatively contesting the exclusion of declaration and verification norms that would bolster the enforcement of BTWC Article X norms. Ironically, the reasons underlying both groups' contestation are how three issues---equality, equity, and equanimity---impact states' economies and their market shares in bioscience and biotechnology. To defend these conclusions, I extract and analyze quantitative and qualitative data from United Nations documents and sources. I then discusses the impact of the findings on international relations, international law, and the future of international agreements. I conclude that the future of international security agreements could be in jeopardy if policy makers do not take a more integrated, interdisciplinary approach that addresses these equality, equity, and equanimity when developing such agreements.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0601
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Government. $3 1043944
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-05A.
790 1 0 $a Shambaugh, George E., IV, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Arend, Anthony C. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Love, Richard A. $e committee member
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3398947