東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

English language learner engagement ...

Almon, Cate.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

English language learner engagement and retention in a community college setting.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	English language learner engagement and retention in a community college setting./
作者:	Almon, Cate.
面頁冊數:	218 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2325.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-07A.
標題:	Education, Community College. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3408684
ISBN:	9781124051536

English language learner engagement and retention in a community college setting.
Almon, Cate.

English language learner engagement and retention in a community college setting. - 218 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2325.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Temple University, 2010.

This multi-method study explored English Language Learner (ELL) enrollment and engagement in a community college to address a dearth of research on ELL retention in this context. Quantitative analyses were performed on four fall semester transcripts of ELLs (N = 161) and on samples of ELLs and non-ELLs (n = 139) matching in age, enrollment status, and race/ethnicity. Quantitative analyses were also performed on The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) instrument for another set of ELLs (N = 45) and matched samples of ELLs and non-ELLs (n = 34). Qualitative analyses of interviews with a third set of ELLs (N = 28) were also conducted. Results suggest that ELLs overall do well as implied by their high GPAs and engagement scores, yet most do not persist long enough to complete the ESL program or graduate. GPAs were well above the minimum for graduation (2.00) and significantly higher (p < .05) than the non-ELLs. ELLs scored higher than the nation in all five benchmarks, and significantly higher than the non-ELLs in the support for learners benchmark. However, even though the majority of ELLs expressed that they wanted an associate's degree, only 43% successfully exit the ESL program and 13% graduate from the college. The graduation rate is significantly less (p < .05) than college (23%) and nation (25%).To explain, certain groups presented higher risk. Students who began in lower levels of ESL were five times less likely to complete the ESL program (p < .05). Nontraditionally aged ELLs had lower GPAs, persisted fewer fall semesters, and graduated less than their counterparts (all significant at p < .05). Also found were risk factors to which students attribute their leaving college: lack of finances, full time work, and family obligations. Interviews revealed implicit risk factors of linguistic challenges and their ELL status at the college, both of which affected their engagement, as well as a lack of procedural knowledge for navigating US colleges that could enable their retention. Students who persist, graduate, or transfer attribute this success to seeking tutoring and investing extra effort. Implications for practice and research are given.

ISBN: 9781124051536Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018008
Education, Community College.

English language learner engagement and retention in a community college setting.
LDR:03336nam 2200337 4500 001 1399710
005 20110926095504.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124051536
035 $a (UMI)AAI3408684
035 $a AAI3408684
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Almon, Cate. $3 1678712
245 1 0 $a English language learner engagement and retention in a community college setting.
300 $a 218 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2325.
500 $a Adviser: Yasuko Kanno.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Temple University, 2010.
520 $a This multi-method study explored English Language Learner (ELL) enrollment and engagement in a community college to address a dearth of research on ELL retention in this context. Quantitative analyses were performed on four fall semester transcripts of ELLs (N = 161) and on samples of ELLs and non-ELLs (n = 139) matching in age, enrollment status, and race/ethnicity. Quantitative analyses were also performed on The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) instrument for another set of ELLs (N = 45) and matched samples of ELLs and non-ELLs (n = 34). Qualitative analyses of interviews with a third set of ELLs (N = 28) were also conducted. Results suggest that ELLs overall do well as implied by their high GPAs and engagement scores, yet most do not persist long enough to complete the ESL program or graduate. GPAs were well above the minimum for graduation (2.00) and significantly higher (p < .05) than the non-ELLs. ELLs scored higher than the nation in all five benchmarks, and significantly higher than the non-ELLs in the support for learners benchmark. However, even though the majority of ELLs expressed that they wanted an associate's degree, only 43% successfully exit the ESL program and 13% graduate from the college. The graduation rate is significantly less (p < .05) than college (23%) and nation (25%).To explain, certain groups presented higher risk. Students who began in lower levels of ESL were five times less likely to complete the ESL program (p < .05). Nontraditionally aged ELLs had lower GPAs, persisted fewer fall semesters, and graduated less than their counterparts (all significant at p < .05). Also found were risk factors to which students attribute their leaving college: lack of finances, full time work, and family obligations. Interviews revealed implicit risk factors of linguistic challenges and their ELL status at the college, both of which affected their engagement, as well as a lack of procedural knowledge for navigating US colleges that could enable their retention. Students who persist, graduate, or transfer attribute this success to seeking tutoring and investing extra effort. Implications for practice and research are given.
590 $a School code: 0225.
650 4 $a Education, Community College. $3 1018008
650 4 $a Education, English as a Second Language. $3 1030294
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a Temple University. $b CITE/Language Arts. $3 1024010
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-07A.
790 1 0 $a Kanno, Yasuko, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Kanno, Yasuko $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Swavely, Jill $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Wanger, Elvis $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Cromley, Jennifer $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Goldblatt, Eli $e committee member
790 $a 0225
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3408684