東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Identifying and describing language ...

Doolan, Shannon Fitzsimmons.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Identifying and describing language ideologies related to Arizona educational language policy.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Identifying and describing language ideologies related to Arizona educational language policy./
作者:	Doolan, Shannon Fitzsimmons.
面頁冊數:	236 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-10, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-10A.
標題:	Language, Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3467048
ISBN:	9781124780740

Identifying and describing language ideologies related to Arizona educational language policy.
Doolan, Shannon Fitzsimmons.

Identifying and describing language ideologies related to Arizona educational language policy. - 236 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-10, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Arizona University, 2011.

Theorists propose that language policy has three components---language management, language practices, and language ideologies of speech community members (Kaplan & Baldauf, 1997; Lo Bianco, 2005; Spolsky, 2004, 2009), yet, these theorists do not specify methods for identifying language ideologies. Furthermore, no research to date has attempted to identify the language ideologies of multiple stakeholders using direct methodological approaches which minimize researcher inference. This dissertation uses survey and corpus data to present a description of language ideologies expressed by important educational stakeholders in Arizona.

ISBN: 9781124780740Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018079
Language, Linguistics.

Identifying and describing language ideologies related to Arizona educational language policy.
LDR:03534nam 2200325 4500 001 1399009
005 20110915090335.5
008 130515s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124780740
035 $a (UMI)AAI3467048
035 $a AAI3467048
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Doolan, Shannon Fitzsimmons. $3 1677940
245 1 0 $a Identifying and describing language ideologies related to Arizona educational language policy.
300 $a 236 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-10, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Mary McGroarty.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Arizona University, 2011.
520 $a Theorists propose that language policy has three components---language management, language practices, and language ideologies of speech community members (Kaplan & Baldauf, 1997; Lo Bianco, 2005; Spolsky, 2004, 2009), yet, these theorists do not specify methods for identifying language ideologies. Furthermore, no research to date has attempted to identify the language ideologies of multiple stakeholders using direct methodological approaches which minimize researcher inference. This dissertation uses survey and corpus data to present a description of language ideologies expressed by important educational stakeholders in Arizona.
520 $a A survey investigation elicited data from politically active voters (N = 703), language managers (N = 51), and teachers (N = 540). A factor analysis of survey data was conducted yielding a solution of five language ideology factors accounting for 53.46% of the variance: Pro-Monolingualism, Pro-Multilingualism, Multiple languages as a problem, Language as a tool, and Language as an intelligence standard. In addition, survey responses were used to explore ideological variation related to ten demographic variables (e.g., gender, age group, home language, party membership, years teaching) using inferential statistics. Stakeholder group, gender, and political ideology significantly differentiated groups of voters across all five language ideologies.
520 $a In addition, a corpus-based analysis was conducted to identify language ideologies in a body of language management texts (1,406,482 words) posted online by the Arizona Department of Education. Collocates modifying core language concepts (e.g., language) in the corpus discourse were used as variables in a factor analysis. The analysis yielded five factors interpreted as language ideologies. The solution accounted for 47.48% of the variance in the data and the five language ideologies were interpreted as: Written language as measurably communicative, Language acquisition as systematically metalinguistic and monolingual, Academic language as standard and informational, Language acquisition as process of decoding meaning, and Nativeness of language skills as marking group variation. In addition, significant differences were found among levels of language policy register and targeted language across several of the language ideologies.
520 $a This study suggests methodological approaches and tools that can be used in future language ideology research as well as conclusions about the ideological context for contemporary language policy development in Arizona.
590 $a School code: 0391.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Education, Policy. $3 1669130
650 4 $a Sociology, Sociolinguistics. $3 1669082
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0636
710 2 $a Northern Arizona University. $3 783744
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-10A.
790 1 0 $a McGroarty, Mary, $e advisor
790 $a 0391
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3467048