東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An analysis of selected Korean hedge...

Yoon, Yeonhee.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An analysis of selected Korean hedges in spoken discourse: Sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic perspectives.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An analysis of selected Korean hedges in spoken discourse: Sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic perspectives./
作者:	Yoon, Yeonhee.
面頁冊數:	261 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-05A.
標題:	Language, Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3448659
ISBN:	9781124553092

An analysis of selected Korean hedges in spoken discourse: Sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic perspectives.
Yoon, Yeonhee.

An analysis of selected Korean hedges in spoken discourse: Sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic perspectives. - 261 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawai'I at Manoa, 2010.

This dissertation presents an empirical analysis of Korean hedges in contemporary spoken discourse. The data analyzed was drawn from my corpus based on approximately 17 hours of unplanned, naturally occurring conversations. This study classified lexical and syntactic hedges in my corpus and investigated the frequency of individual hedge items. It provided an analysis of the correlation between hedge use and sociopragmatic factors as well as pragmalinguistic factors.

ISBN: 9781124553092Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018079
Language, Linguistics.

An analysis of selected Korean hedges in spoken discourse: Sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic perspectives.
LDR:03271nam 2200301 4500 001 1398942
005 20110915090315.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124553092
035 $a (UMI)AAI3448659
035 $a AAI3448659
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Yoon, Yeonhee. $3 1677862
245 1 3 $a An analysis of selected Korean hedges in spoken discourse: Sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic perspectives.
300 $a 261 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-05, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Ho-min Sohn.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawai'I at Manoa, 2010.
520 $a This dissertation presents an empirical analysis of Korean hedges in contemporary spoken discourse. The data analyzed was drawn from my corpus based on approximately 17 hours of unplanned, naturally occurring conversations. This study classified lexical and syntactic hedges in my corpus and investigated the frequency of individual hedge items. It provided an analysis of the correlation between hedge use and sociopragmatic factors as well as pragmalinguistic factors.
520 $a The results of statistical analysis reveal that (i) more hedges are used in two-party conversations than in multiple-party (three or four participants) conversations in Korean spoken discourse, (ii) more hedges are used in conversations with personal topics than with impersonal topics in Korean spoken discourse, and (iii) hedges in Korean spoken discourse are employed as a positive politeness strategy as well as a negative politeness strategy although hedges have been viewed traditionally as a form of negative politeness.
520 $a There are several theoretical contributions. First, this study shows that previous sociolinguistic views on the correlation between hedge use and a social structural factor such as gender have reflected a tendency for overgeneralization. Second, the analysis of this study proposes the importance of social situational factors such as the number of speakers and the topic of conversation for sociopragmatic analysis. The most influential factors which affect hedge use in Korean spoken discourse are not social structural factors such as gender, age, region, or occupation, but social situational factors. Third, this study elucidates the function of hedges as interactive strategies which may facilitate the success of interactions between interlocutors, enhance interpersonal rapport, and establish solidarity in terms of a positive politeness strategy extending beyond the negative politeness strategy. Fourth, this study demonstrates that an analysis that include both sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic perspectives is necessary and important when analyzing hedges. According to the empirical analysis of Korean hedges in this study, Korean hedge use is affected by contextual factors as well as strategic factors. Thus, multi-layered approach is meaningful for analyzing and comprehending the complexity of the hedge.
590 $a School code: 0085.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Sociology, Sociolinguistics. $3 1669082
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0636
710 2 $a University of Hawai'I at Manoa. $3 1673989
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-05A.
790 1 0 $a Sohn, Ho-min, $e advisor
790 $a 0085
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3448659