東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Evidentiality and the structure of s...

Murray, Sarah E.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts./
作者:	Murray, Sarah E.
面頁冊數:	286 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-03, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-03A.
標題:	Language, Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3434657
ISBN:	9781124418070

Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts.
Murray, Sarah E.

Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts. - 286 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-03, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2010.

Many languages grammatically mark evidentiality , i.e., the source of information. In assertions, evidentials indicate the source of information of the speaker while in questions they indicate the expected source of information of the addressee. This dissertation examines the semantics and pragmatics of evidentiality and illocutionary mood, set within formal theories of meaning and discourse. The empirical focus is the evidential system of Cheyenne (Algonquian: Montana), which is analyzed based on several years of fieldwork by the author.

ISBN: 9781124418070Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018079
Language, Linguistics.

Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts.
LDR:03342nam 2200337 4500 001 1398893
005 20110915090259.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124418070
035 $a (UMI)AAI3434657
035 $a AAI3434657
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Murray, Sarah E. $3 1677811
245 1 0 $a Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts.
300 $a 286 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-03, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Maria Bittner.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2010.
520 $a Many languages grammatically mark evidentiality , i.e., the source of information. In assertions, evidentials indicate the source of information of the speaker while in questions they indicate the expected source of information of the addressee. This dissertation examines the semantics and pragmatics of evidentiality and illocutionary mood, set within formal theories of meaning and discourse. The empirical focus is the evidential system of Cheyenne (Algonquian: Montana), which is analyzed based on several years of fieldwork by the author.
520 $a In Cheyenne, evidentials are part of the illocutionary mood paradigm. Based on this grammatical system and crosslinguistic data in the literature, I propose a new theory of evidentials. I argue that evidentials contribute not-at-issue content, which cannot be directly challenged or denied. This content is added directly to the common ground, without negotiation. In contrast, at-issue content, the main point of a sentence, is proposed to the common ground, up for negotiation.
520 $a This analysis of evidentials implies a more articulated theory of assertion and other speech acts. In particular, I argue that all speech acts are structured into three components: presentation of the at-issue proposition, a non-negotiable update that directly restricts the common ground, and a negotiable update that imposes structure on the common ground. I implement this proposal in an update semantics with individual, modal, and propositional discourse referents. The distinction between at-issue and not-at-issue information comes out as an instance of grammatical centering in the modal domain. The presentation of the at-issue proposition is modeled as the introduction of a propositional discourse referent. This predicts that only the at-issue proposition can be referred to in subsequent discourse, and the non-challengeability of the evidential falls out as a special case of propositional anaphora.
520 $a The proposed analysis can be extended to evidentials and related phenomena in other languages. While there are real crosslinguistic differences in the behavior of evidentials, there are also many commonalities. The proposed analysis captures the properties that all evidential systems share, but is fine-grained enough to account for variation. On this analysis, evidentials crosslinguistically form a natural semantic class.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
650 4 $a Sociology, Sociolinguistics. $3 1669082
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0636
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. $b Graduate School - New Brunswick. $3 1019196
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-03A.
790 1 0 $a Bittner, Maria, $e advisor
790 $a 0190
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3434657