語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Illusions of a future: Psychoanalysi...
~
Schechter, Kathryn A.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Illusions of a future: Psychoanalysis and the biopolitics of desire.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Illusions of a future: Psychoanalysis and the biopolitics of desire./
作者:
Schechter, Kathryn A.
面頁冊數:
273 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-10, Section: A, page: 3697.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International71-10A.
標題:
Anthropology, Cultural. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3419694
ISBN:
9781124198071
Illusions of a future: Psychoanalysis and the biopolitics of desire.
Schechter, Kathryn A.
Illusions of a future: Psychoanalysis and the biopolitics of desire.
- 273 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-10, Section: A, page: 3697.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2010.
In this dissertation I describe the cultural and social processes through which psychoanalysis is being transformed under neoliberal medicine in the United States. By combining an ethnographic, historical, and theoretical account of psychoanalysis' undecidability qua cultural practice I seek to illuminate the particular deepening under neoliberalism of a fundamental structural condition of double bind that plagues the psychoanalytic institution, and then to demonstrate the inexorable "governmentalization" of psychoanalytic practice over the course of the transition from liberal to neoliberal reason in late 20th century medicine. This governmentalization installed at the very heart of the clinical encounter a set of logics and practices of accountability that has steadily subsumed the desiring professional subject within biopolitical logics of population, insurance, risk, and calculability, and yet, in a simultaneous and seemingly paradoxical emergence within this field of managed and administered behavioral health the intensely personal intimacy of the patient-analyst pair has taken center stage in psychoanalysis over the past twenty years. In looking at how U.S. psychoanalysts demarcate "psychoanalysis" from "psychotherapy" and "transference" from "the real relationship," I draw special attention to their polemical evaluations of one another's positions on "what works" in psychoanalysis and their endorsement of a set of more and more personal, less and less alienable qualities of expertise -- qualities of work on the self intertwined with work on the other -- that are embedded in the notion of the real relationship. In this way I expose the work that the common accusation "that's not analysis" has done historically within a community of psychoanalytic practice in order to specify the means by which this community has been exquisitely vulnerable to a kind of constant, combative, autoimmune paregicide. Its members seek to neutralize their conflicts by reframing sexuality, the negative, the death drive, and the figure of the father, replacing these distinguishing features with a relational, maternal, developmental formula and an imaginary of objective need and its real satisfaction rather than wishful fantasy and its interpretative resolution. By recoding all of psychopathology as "pre-Oedipal," by siting its traumatic derivation in the earliest years of life, "analysis" becomes a maternal labor of making up life from below, akin to what Hardt calls a "biopower from below," rather than a paternal labor of interpreting already-made-life from above. As a set of indirect techniques for controlling others' conduct, work on the real relationship grounds its authority through such a "developmental" claim to objectivity. As a form of sociality directly exploitable by capital and an emerging form of governmentality geared to controlling a market by bundling enrollment and problematization, the real relationship is installed, in a reflex to conserve work, as the privileged means of creating the social bond itself.
ISBN: 9781124198071Subjects--Topical Terms:
735016
Anthropology, Cultural.
Illusions of a future: Psychoanalysis and the biopolitics of desire.
LDR
:04049nam 2200301 4500
001
1396159
005
20110531080611.5
008
130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781124198071
035
$a
(UMI)AAI3419694
035
$a
AAI3419694
040
$a
UMI
$c
UMI
100
1
$a
Schechter, Kathryn A.
$3
1674925
245
1 0
$a
Illusions of a future: Psychoanalysis and the biopolitics of desire.
300
$a
273 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-10, Section: A, page: 3697.
500
$a
Adviser: Raymond Fogelson.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2010.
520
$a
In this dissertation I describe the cultural and social processes through which psychoanalysis is being transformed under neoliberal medicine in the United States. By combining an ethnographic, historical, and theoretical account of psychoanalysis' undecidability qua cultural practice I seek to illuminate the particular deepening under neoliberalism of a fundamental structural condition of double bind that plagues the psychoanalytic institution, and then to demonstrate the inexorable "governmentalization" of psychoanalytic practice over the course of the transition from liberal to neoliberal reason in late 20th century medicine. This governmentalization installed at the very heart of the clinical encounter a set of logics and practices of accountability that has steadily subsumed the desiring professional subject within biopolitical logics of population, insurance, risk, and calculability, and yet, in a simultaneous and seemingly paradoxical emergence within this field of managed and administered behavioral health the intensely personal intimacy of the patient-analyst pair has taken center stage in psychoanalysis over the past twenty years. In looking at how U.S. psychoanalysts demarcate "psychoanalysis" from "psychotherapy" and "transference" from "the real relationship," I draw special attention to their polemical evaluations of one another's positions on "what works" in psychoanalysis and their endorsement of a set of more and more personal, less and less alienable qualities of expertise -- qualities of work on the self intertwined with work on the other -- that are embedded in the notion of the real relationship. In this way I expose the work that the common accusation "that's not analysis" has done historically within a community of psychoanalytic practice in order to specify the means by which this community has been exquisitely vulnerable to a kind of constant, combative, autoimmune paregicide. Its members seek to neutralize their conflicts by reframing sexuality, the negative, the death drive, and the figure of the father, replacing these distinguishing features with a relational, maternal, developmental formula and an imaginary of objective need and its real satisfaction rather than wishful fantasy and its interpretative resolution. By recoding all of psychopathology as "pre-Oedipal," by siting its traumatic derivation in the earliest years of life, "analysis" becomes a maternal labor of making up life from below, akin to what Hardt calls a "biopower from below," rather than a paternal labor of interpreting already-made-life from above. As a set of indirect techniques for controlling others' conduct, work on the real relationship grounds its authority through such a "developmental" claim to objectivity. As a form of sociality directly exploitable by capital and an emerging form of governmentality geared to controlling a market by bundling enrollment and problematization, the real relationship is installed, in a reflex to conserve work, as the privileged means of creating the social bond itself.
590
$a
School code: 0330.
650
4
$a
Anthropology, Cultural.
$3
735016
650
4
$a
Health Sciences, General.
$3
1017817
690
$a
0326
690
$a
0566
710
2
$a
The University of Chicago.
$b
Anthropology.
$3
1674926
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
71-10A.
790
1 0
$a
Fogelson, Raymond,
$e
advisor
790
1 0
$a
Silverstein, Michael
$e
committee member
790
1 0
$a
Farquhar, Judith
$e
committee member
790
$a
0330
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2010
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3419694
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9159298
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入