語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The modals of possibility and permis...
~
Beiler, Ingrid Rodrick.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The modals of possibility and permission in Standard English varieties of England, Scotland, and the United States: A study in dialectal variation.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The modals of possibility and permission in Standard English varieties of England, Scotland, and the United States: A study in dialectal variation./
作者:
Beiler, Ingrid Rodrick.
面頁冊數:
110 p.
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2633.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International48-05.
標題:
Language, Linguistics. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1484434
ISBN:
9781109722826
The modals of possibility and permission in Standard English varieties of England, Scotland, and the United States: A study in dialectal variation.
Beiler, Ingrid Rodrick.
The modals of possibility and permission in Standard English varieties of England, Scotland, and the United States: A study in dialectal variation.
- 110 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2633.
Thesis (M.A.)--The American University, 2010.
Variation in modal usage among Standard English varieties has been found in corpus studies of British English (BrE), American English (AmE), and Australian English (AusE) (Coates & Leech, 1980; Ljung, 1996; Collins, 2007, 2009). In addition, elicitation and case studies of Standard Scottish English (St ScE) (Brown & Miller, 1975; Brown & Millar, 1980; Miller & Brown, 1982) have documented divergence between St ScE and the Standard English of England (St EngE), including the near absence of may from St ScE. The current study investigated variation in the use and connotations of the modals of permission and possibility ( may, might, can, and could ) in St EngE, St AmE, and St ScE through interviews and written questionnaires administered to 14 American, 11 English, and 15 Scottish students at universities in Washington, DC, Leeds, and Edinburgh. The study found dialectal differences in the use of may and non-modal expressions, and will emerged as an additional modal of possibility for some Scottish and English respondents. In all dialects, the modals of possibility were not found to differ by degree of likelihood, while the modals of permission were strongly marked for style.
ISBN: 9781109722826Subjects--Topical Terms:
1018079
Language, Linguistics.
The modals of possibility and permission in Standard English varieties of England, Scotland, and the United States: A study in dialectal variation.
LDR
:02146nam 2200289 4500
001
1395707
005
20110520122431.5
008
130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781109722826
035
$a
(UMI)AAI1484434
035
$a
AAI1484434
040
$a
UMI
$c
UMI
100
1
$a
Beiler, Ingrid Rodrick.
$3
1674426
245
1 4
$a
The modals of possibility and permission in Standard English varieties of England, Scotland, and the United States: A study in dialectal variation.
300
$a
110 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2633.
500
$a
Adviser: Robin C. Barr.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--The American University, 2010.
520
$a
Variation in modal usage among Standard English varieties has been found in corpus studies of British English (BrE), American English (AmE), and Australian English (AusE) (Coates & Leech, 1980; Ljung, 1996; Collins, 2007, 2009). In addition, elicitation and case studies of Standard Scottish English (St ScE) (Brown & Miller, 1975; Brown & Millar, 1980; Miller & Brown, 1982) have documented divergence between St ScE and the Standard English of England (St EngE), including the near absence of may from St ScE. The current study investigated variation in the use and connotations of the modals of permission and possibility ( may, might, can, and could ) in St EngE, St AmE, and St ScE through interviews and written questionnaires administered to 14 American, 11 English, and 15 Scottish students at universities in Washington, DC, Leeds, and Edinburgh. The study found dialectal differences in the use of may and non-modal expressions, and will emerged as an additional modal of possibility for some Scottish and English respondents. In all dialects, the modals of possibility were not found to differ by degree of likelihood, while the modals of permission were strongly marked for style.
590
$a
School code: 0008.
650
4
$a
Language, Linguistics.
$3
1018079
650
4
$a
Education, English as a Second Language.
$3
1030294
650
4
$a
Education, Foreign Language.
$3
1064562
690
$a
0290
690
$a
0441
690
$a
0444
710
2
$a
The American University.
$3
1017567
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
48-05.
790
1 0
$a
Barr, Robin C.,
$e
advisor
790
$a
0008
791
$a
M.A.
792
$a
2010
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1484434
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9158846
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入