東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How principled are designers? A stud...

Rauchfuss, Gary H.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How principled are designers? A study of instructional designers use of first principles.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How principled are designers? A study of instructional designers use of first principles./
作者:	Rauchfuss, Gary H.
面頁冊數:	115 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2789.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-08A.
標題:	Education, Instructional Design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3412484
ISBN:	9781124109817

How principled are designers? A study of instructional designers use of first principles.
Rauchfuss, Gary H.

How principled are designers? A study of instructional designers use of first principles. - 115 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2789.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2010.

Expertise has been studied in many fields including instructional design; however, differences between novice and expert designers' use of instructional design principals was not fully researched. This study extended knowledge of instructional design expertise by examining the relationships among years of formal instructional design education, years of experience, and use of design principles through retrospective analysis of design products. A correlational study was conduct with 19 participants that designed lessons for military, business, higher education and K-12 settings. Participants submitted courses or lessons that they had designed with the past year and the products were evaluated to determine if the designer used particular design principles. Data analyzed resulted in no significant relationships between years of formal instructional design education, years of experience, and use of design principles; however, this result may be due to the small sample size. Separation of participants into novice and expert categories revealed a significant relationship between years of formal instructional design education and use of design principles in the expert designer group. Study results show that using design principles alone as a measure of instructional design expertise may not be sufficient. Therefore, future research is necessary to clarify and extend the research conducted in this study. Studies are needed that expand the examination of design principles from five principles examined in this study to more extensive lists of principles. More research is necessary that examines the products of instructional design in relation to expertise, including studies that correlate learning outcomes in relation to other measures of instructional design expertise.

ISBN: 9781124109817Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669073
Education, Instructional Design.

How principled are designers? A study of instructional designers use of first principles.
LDR:02784nam 2200301 4500 001 1395622
005 20110520122408.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124109817
035 $a (UMI)AAI3412484
035 $a AAI3412484
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Rauchfuss, Gary H. $3 1674332
245 1 0 $a How principled are designers? A study of instructional designers use of first principles.
300 $a 115 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2789.
500 $a Adviser: Kenneth Silber.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2010.
520 $a Expertise has been studied in many fields including instructional design; however, differences between novice and expert designers' use of instructional design principals was not fully researched. This study extended knowledge of instructional design expertise by examining the relationships among years of formal instructional design education, years of experience, and use of design principles through retrospective analysis of design products. A correlational study was conduct with 19 participants that designed lessons for military, business, higher education and K-12 settings. Participants submitted courses or lessons that they had designed with the past year and the products were evaluated to determine if the designer used particular design principles. Data analyzed resulted in no significant relationships between years of formal instructional design education, years of experience, and use of design principles; however, this result may be due to the small sample size. Separation of participants into novice and expert categories revealed a significant relationship between years of formal instructional design education and use of design principles in the expert designer group. Study results show that using design principles alone as a measure of instructional design expertise may not be sufficient. Therefore, future research is necessary to clarify and extend the research conducted in this study. Studies are needed that expand the examination of design principles from five principles examined in this study to more extensive lists of principles. More research is necessary that examines the products of instructional design in relation to expertise, including studies that correlate learning outcomes in relation to other measures of instructional design expertise.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Education, Instructional Design. $3 1669073
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Education. $3 1018430
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-08A.
790 1 0 $a Silber, Kenneth, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Sims, Roderick $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Butler, Clifford $e committee member
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3412484