東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The cognitive authority of collectiv...

Goldman, James L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The cognitive authority of collective intelligence.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The cognitive authority of collective intelligence./
作者:	Goldman, James L.
面頁冊數:	248 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2688.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-08A.
標題:	Library Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3415733
ISBN:	9781124096889

The cognitive authority of collective intelligence.
Goldman, James L.

The cognitive authority of collective intelligence. - 248 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2688.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Drexel University, 2010.

Collaboration tools based on World Wide Web technologies now enable and encourage large groups of people who do not previously know one another, and who may share no other affiliation, to work together cooperatively and often anonymously on large information projects such as online encyclopedias and complex websites. Making use of information created by these projects depends on perceptions of its credibility and quality. Advocates of collective intelligence champion the idea that with enough eyeballs reviewing and revising collaboratively-authored information, any errors and omissions are likely to be found and corrected. An important question for information science and for content producers/distributors is whether users share that view.

ISBN: 9781124096889Subjects--Topical Terms:

881164
Library Science.

The cognitive authority of collective intelligence.
LDR:03325nam 2200337 4500 001 1395612
005 20110520122406.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124096889
035 $a (UMI)AAI3415733
035 $a AAI3415733
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Goldman, James L. $3 1674321
245 1 4 $a The cognitive authority of collective intelligence.
300 $a 248 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-08, Section: A, page: 2688.
500 $a Adviser: Michael E. Atwood.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Drexel University, 2010.
520 $a Collaboration tools based on World Wide Web technologies now enable and encourage large groups of people who do not previously know one another, and who may share no other affiliation, to work together cooperatively and often anonymously on large information projects such as online encyclopedias and complex websites. Making use of information created by these projects depends on perceptions of its credibility and quality. Advocates of collective intelligence champion the idea that with enough eyeballs reviewing and revising collaboratively-authored information, any errors and omissions are likely to be found and corrected. An important question for information science and for content producers/distributors is whether users share that view.
520 $a In this three-factor laboratory study, participants were asked to read and then answer questions about the content and quality of two articles. Participants were randomly exposed to one of two indicated authoring conditions: an identified single author with subject matter expertise, or material that originated from a "Wiki-style" website. Additionally, participants were randomly exposed to one of three possible hints of the material's authority: a chart showing the history of Web download activity, a list of references linked to sources on the World Wide Web, or neither hint. One article presented factual technical material; the other made a persuasive argument.
520 $a Participants exposed to indications of conventional authorship found the material to have been of generally higher quality than participants exposed to the same material authored Wiki-style. The chart of activity was an indicator of quality for the conventional authoring condition, while the list of references filled that role in the Wiki-style condition. Participants who use the Web more frequently were more critical of Wiki-style sources, and especially so in the case of the persuasive article. Men were more critical of Wiki-style sources than women were.
520 $a People prefer information that they perceive is credible. For reinforcing perceptions of credibility, results suggest that practitioners working in collective intelligence do as much as they can to pierce the veil of anonymity that surrounds publicly-authored works by including more information about the authors, and by better describing the information's editorial activity and usage.
590 $a School code: 0065.
650 4 $a Library Science. $3 881164
650 4 $a Web Studies. $3 1026830
650 4 $a Information Science. $3 1017528
650 4 $a Computer Science. $3 626642
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0646
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0984
710 2 $a Drexel University. $3 1018434
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-08A.
790 1 0 $a Atwood, Michael E., $e advisor
790 $a 0065
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3415733