東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A discourse analysis of the periphra...

Johnson, Carl E.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A discourse analysis of the periphrastic imperfect in the Greek New Testament writings of Luke.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A discourse analysis of the periphrastic imperfect in the Greek New Testament writings of Luke./
作者:	Johnson, Carl E.
面頁冊數:	231 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2439.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-07A.
標題:	Language, Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3408929
ISBN:	9781124055589

A discourse analysis of the periphrastic imperfect in the Greek New Testament writings of Luke.
Johnson, Carl E.

A discourse analysis of the periphrastic imperfect in the Greek New Testament writings of Luke. - 231 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2439.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Arlington, 2010.

Motivated by Bloomfield's belief that linguistic variation is not without motivation, this paper seeks to determine the distinction between the morphological imperfect and periphrastic imperfect of Koine Greek within the New Testament writings of Luke.

ISBN: 9781124055589Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018079
Language, Linguistics.

A discourse analysis of the periphrastic imperfect in the Greek New Testament writings of Luke.
LDR:04071nam 2200325 4500 001 1395601
005 20110520122403.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124055589
035 $a (UMI)AAI3408929
035 $a AAI3408929
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Johnson, Carl E. $3 1674307
245 1 2 $a A discourse analysis of the periphrastic imperfect in the Greek New Testament writings of Luke.
300 $a 231 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2439.
500 $a Adviser: Jerold A. Edmondson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Arlington, 2010.
520 $a Motivated by Bloomfield's belief that linguistic variation is not without motivation, this paper seeks to determine the distinction between the morphological imperfect and periphrastic imperfect of Koine Greek within the New Testament writings of Luke.
520 $a This study suggests that: (1) The periphrastic imperfect occurs only within narrative sections of the New Testament and is most prominent in the writings of Luke. (2) The number of periphrastic imperfects has been recently over reported. (3) The periphrastic imperfect is a more marked form of Koine Greek which developed in accordance with general rules of grammaticalization. (4) The discourse function of periphrastic imperfects has not been previously cataloged because traditional codification has been limited to the confines of the sentence, their existence was merely attributed to Aramaic influence, and their uniqueness was largely ignored. (5) Just as Longacre has shown the historical present to provide highlighted storyline, the periphrastic imperfect provides highlighted background and can be ranked accordingly. (6) The Periphrastic imperfect highlights background for introductory or linking purposes by presenting particularly salient information concerning location and/or action. This suggests the following four categories: (a) INTRODUCTORY LOCATIVE which highlights action whose placement in a specific location or time is important to the subsequent narrative. Both location and action are important. (b) LINKING LOCATIVE which highlights action in a specific physical location or time which links the passage to a previous or subsequent narrative which involves the same participants in the same or similar action. Both location and action are important. (c) INTRODUCTORY ACTION which highlights the involvement of the subject(s) in an action which is important to the subsequent narrative. (d) LINKING ACTION which highlights involvement of the subject(s) in an action which links the passage to a previous or subsequent narrative involving the same participant(s) in the same or similar action. (7) Therefore, a Lukan periphrastic imperfect unites an imperfect form of eivmi, (be) with a nominative present participle which agrees in number with the subject of the copula in order to express a highlighted, ongoing state or action which may occur in a spatial or temporal sphere. Said action is usually agentive.
520 $a After an initial examination of a reduced number of tokens, I developed a definition for the periphrastic imperfect which addresses both form and function. I used that definition to reexamine each of the tokens proposed by Boyer (Boyer, 1986) as well as those from my own reduced list. In Chapter 3, genuine periphrastic imperfects are grouped by function and discussed in detail. Chapter 4 summarizes my findings and provides additional support for the same. In Appendix E, I list all periphrastic imperfects found in the writings of Luke. In Appendix F, I list all of the overt tokens excluded from Boyer's list.
590 $a School code: 2502.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Religion, Biblical Studies. $3 1020189
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0321
710 2 $a The University of Texas at Arlington. $b Linguistics. $3 1026506
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-07A.
790 1 0 $a Edmondson, Jerold A., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Burquest, Donald $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Chiasson, Charles $e committee member
790 $a 2502
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3408929