東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Arguing security: Rhetoric, media en...

Lusk, Adam.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Arguing security: Rhetoric, media environment, and threat legitimation .

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Arguing security: Rhetoric, media environment, and threat legitimation ./
作者:	Lusk, Adam.
面頁冊數:	341 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-02, Section: A, page: 0707.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-02A.
標題:	Political Science, International Relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3390503
ISBN:	9781109597646

Arguing security: Rhetoric, media environment, and threat legitimation .
Lusk, Adam.

Arguing security: Rhetoric, media environment, and threat legitimation . - 341 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-02, Section: A, page: 0707.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 2010.

In this dissertation, I study the process of gaining public consent about a security threat, or threat legitimation. Threats require legitimation because they are social facts and not objective truths or subjective perceptions. I argue rhetorical resources and strategies affect threat legitimation. Political actors deploy rhetorical resources and strategies in order to generate consent. The rhetorical resources connect together the rhetorical resources to construct a threat narrative used in the public debates. Moreover, I argue that the media environment influences how rhetorical strategies affect threat legitimation, acting as a conditional variable. Therefore I trace the threat narratives in six episodes in the history of United States foreign policy. Through process tracing, I highlight how rhetorical resources and strategies changed the public debates and level of consent about a threat, and how the media environment influenced these rhetorical strategies.

ISBN: 9781109597646Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669648
Political Science, International Relations.

Arguing security: Rhetoric, media environment, and threat legitimation .
LDR:01854nam 2200277 4500 001 1394880
005 20110506135124.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109597646
035 $a (UMI)AAI3390503
035 $a AAI3390503
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Lusk, Adam. $3 1673532
245 1 0 $a Arguing security: Rhetoric, media environment, and threat legitimation .
300 $a 341 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-02, Section: A, page: 0707.
500 $a Adviser: Mark A. Pollack.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Temple University, 2010.
520 $a In this dissertation, I study the process of gaining public consent about a security threat, or threat legitimation. Threats require legitimation because they are social facts and not objective truths or subjective perceptions. I argue rhetorical resources and strategies affect threat legitimation. Political actors deploy rhetorical resources and strategies in order to generate consent. The rhetorical resources connect together the rhetorical resources to construct a threat narrative used in the public debates. Moreover, I argue that the media environment influences how rhetorical strategies affect threat legitimation, acting as a conditional variable. Therefore I trace the threat narratives in six episodes in the history of United States foreign policy. Through process tracing, I highlight how rhetorical resources and strategies changed the public debates and level of consent about a threat, and how the media environment influenced these rhetorical strategies.
590 $a School code: 0225.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Temple University. $b Political Science. $3 1673533
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-02A.
790 1 0 $a Pollack, Mark A., $e advisor
790 $a 0225
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3390503