東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Curriculum coherence: A comparative ...

Huang, Fang.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Curriculum coherence: A comparative analysis of elementary science content standards in People's Republic of China and the USA.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Curriculum coherence: A comparative analysis of elementary science content standards in People's Republic of China and the USA./
作者:	Huang, Fang.
面頁冊數:	98 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-06, Section: A, page: 2000.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-06A.
標題:	Education, Elementary. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3410407
ISBN:	9781124012254

Curriculum coherence: A comparative analysis of elementary science content standards in People's Republic of China and the USA.
Huang, Fang.

Curriculum coherence: A comparative analysis of elementary science content standards in People's Republic of China and the USA. - 98 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-06, Section: A, page: 2000.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Western Michigan University, 2010.

This study examines elementary science content standards curriculum coherence between the People's Republic of China and the United States of America. Three aspects of curriculum coherence are examined in this study: topic inclusion, topic duration, and curriculum structure. Specifically this study centers on the following research questions: (1) What science knowledge is intended for elementary students in each country? (2) How long each topic stays in the curriculum? (3) How these topics sequence and connect with each other? (4) And finally, what is the implication for elementary science curriculum development?

ISBN: 9781124012254Subjects--Topical Terms:

516171
Education, Elementary.

Curriculum coherence: A comparative analysis of elementary science content standards in People's Republic of China and the USA.
LDR:03019nam 2200325 4500 001 1394741
005 20110429093258.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124012254
035 $a (UMI)AAI3410407
035 $a AAI3410407
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Huang, Fang. $3 1673384
245 1 0 $a Curriculum coherence: A comparative analysis of elementary science content standards in People's Republic of China and the USA.
300 $a 98 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-06, Section: A, page: 2000.
500 $a Adviser: Marcia Fetters.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Western Michigan University, 2010.
520 $a This study examines elementary science content standards curriculum coherence between the People's Republic of China and the United States of America. Three aspects of curriculum coherence are examined in this study: topic inclusion, topic duration, and curriculum structure. Specifically this study centers on the following research questions: (1) What science knowledge is intended for elementary students in each country? (2) How long each topic stays in the curriculum? (3) How these topics sequence and connect with each other? (4) And finally, what is the implication for elementary science curriculum development?
520 $a Four intended science curriculum frameworks were selected respectively for each country. A technique of General Topic Trace Mapping (GTTM) was applied to generate the composite science content standards out of the selected curriculum for each country.
520 $a In comparison, the composite USA and Chinese elementary science content standards form a stark contrast: a bunch of broad topics vs. a focus on a set of key topics at each grade; an average of 3.4 year topic duration vs. an average of 1.68 year topic duration; a stress on connections among related ideas vs. a discrete disposition of related ideas; laundry list topic organization vs. hierarchical organization of science topics.
520 $a In analyzing the interrelationships among these characteristics, this study reached implications for developing coherent science content standards: First, for the overall curriculum, the topic inclusion should reflect the logical and sequential nature of knowledge in science. Second, for each grade level, less, rather than more science topics should be focused. Third, however, it should be clarified that a balance should be made between curriculum breadth and depth by considering student needs, subject matter, and child development. Fourth, the topic duration should not be too long. The lengthy topic duration tends to undermine links among ideas as well as lead to superficial treatment of topics.
590 $a School code: 0257.
650 4 $a Education, Elementary. $3 516171
650 4 $a Education, Sciences. $3 1017897
650 4 $a Education, Curriculum and Instruction. $3 576301
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a Western Michigan University. $3 804473
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-06A.
790 1 0 $a Fetters, Marcia, $e advisor
790 $a 0257
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3410407