東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Who makes the rules? Why the United ...

Post, David C.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Who makes the rules? Why the United States succeeds or fails in shaping the global agenda.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Who makes the rules? Why the United States succeeds or fails in shaping the global agenda./
作者:	Post, David C.
面頁冊數:	307 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2638.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-07A.
標題:	Political Science, International Relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3407938
ISBN:	9781124033839

Who makes the rules? Why the United States succeeds or fails in shaping the global agenda.
Post, David C.

Who makes the rules? Why the United States succeeds or fails in shaping the global agenda. - 307 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2638.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2010.

Among other characteristics, one facet of the unipolar world that clearly differentiates it from previous eras is the degree to which interactions between states are increasingly institutionalized. While the United States continues to play an integral role in the formation of new agreements, a variety of global institutions have been established in recent years in the face of opposition from the United States. Though the literature on institutional formation is rich and diverse, much of it suggests that the formation of institutions in the face of opposition from the world's most powerful state should be highly unlikely. As such, the existence of "outliers" suggests that existing theoretical paradigms on institutional formation may need to be reassessed and reapplied to better take the dynamics of unipolarity into account.

ISBN: 9781124033839Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669648
Political Science, International Relations.

Who makes the rules? Why the United States succeeds or fails in shaping the global agenda.
LDR:03074nam 2200325 4500 001 1394554
005 20110429092853.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124033839
035 $a (UMI)AAI3407938
035 $a AAI3407938
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Post, David C. $3 1673182
245 1 0 $a Who makes the rules? Why the United States succeeds or fails in shaping the global agenda.
300 $a 307 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2638.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew Bennett.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2010.
520 $a Among other characteristics, one facet of the unipolar world that clearly differentiates it from previous eras is the degree to which interactions between states are increasingly institutionalized. While the United States continues to play an integral role in the formation of new agreements, a variety of global institutions have been established in recent years in the face of opposition from the United States. Though the literature on institutional formation is rich and diverse, much of it suggests that the formation of institutions in the face of opposition from the world's most powerful state should be highly unlikely. As such, the existence of "outliers" suggests that existing theoretical paradigms on institutional formation may need to be reassessed and reapplied to better take the dynamics of unipolarity into account.
520 $a How do institutions form in the face of hegemonic opposition? Why has the United States lost control over the agenda in many post cold-war international treaty negotiations? What were the tipping points that changed the negotiation dynamics? Where, when and how could the United States have intervened to alter the outcome? What are the implications for international relations theory and practice? This dissertation attempts to shed light on these and other related questions.
520 $a Drawing on descriptive quantitative data and a range of case studies including the Ottawa Treaty on Landmines, Kyoto Protocol and International Criminal Court, this dissertation tests a theoretical model aimed at explaining the post-Cold War emergence of global international institutions that do not reflect the United States' preferences. The results of the case studies suggest that a variety of factors including ineffective diplomacy, changes in the structure of the international system and the emergence of new methods of institutional formation have ultimately led to the creation of institutions that the United States opposes. These findings have important implications for international relations theory and practice.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Government. $3 1043944
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-07A.
790 1 0 $a Bennett, Andrew, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Stanley, Elizabeth $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Arend, Anthony $e committee member
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3407938