東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Investigation of the effects of team...

Martinez, Rachael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Investigation of the effects of team coaching, performance feedback, and collective efficacy on small group performance.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Investigation of the effects of team coaching, performance feedback, and collective efficacy on small group performance./
作者:	Martinez, Rachael.
面頁冊數:	61 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-01, page: 0711.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International49-01.
標題:	Psychology, Social. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1480876
ISBN:	9781124202181

Investigation of the effects of team coaching, performance feedback, and collective efficacy on small group performance.
Martinez, Rachael.

Investigation of the effects of team coaching, performance feedback, and collective efficacy on small group performance. - 61 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-01, page: 0711.

Thesis (M.A.)--Loyola University Chicago, 2010.

Research has demonstrated that there are a variety of factors that influence group performance such as team coaching, feedback, and collective efficacy. A study was conducted to determine whether consultative team coaching improves performance and at what point---beginning or middle---it is most beneficial to the team. One hundred eleven dyads, comprised of 222 students, participated in this study. The dyads performed a task twice in which they were given team coaching before the first attempt, after the first attempt, or not at all. In addition, feedback was manipulated such that teams received positive or negative feedback after their first attempt of the task. Each participant filled out questionnaires assessing collective efficacy, group goals, and group cohesiveness at three different times---beginning, middle, and end---over the course of the study. Results indicated there was a significant main effect of team coaching, however it was due to superior performance by groups in the no coaching condition during the first performance period. In addition, there were significant Time x Coaching interactions predicting group cohesiveness and group goals. Overall, collective efficacy was positively related to group goals and group cohesiveness. Furthermore, collective efficacy was positively related to group performance such that group performance influenced the team's collective efficacy. Moreover, team coaching led to strategy improvement. Limitations of current study and implications for further research are discussed.

ISBN: 9781124202181Subjects--Topical Terms:

529430
Psychology, Social.

Investigation of the effects of team coaching, performance feedback, and collective efficacy on small group performance.
LDR:02530nam 2200301 4500 001 1394482
005 20110422103526.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124202181
035 $a (UMI)AAI1480876
035 $a AAI1480876
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Martinez, Rachael. $3 1673106
245 1 0 $a Investigation of the effects of team coaching, performance feedback, and collective efficacy on small group performance.
300 $a 61 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 49-01, page: 0711.
500 $a Adviser: Robert S. Tindale.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Loyola University Chicago, 2010.
520 $a Research has demonstrated that there are a variety of factors that influence group performance such as team coaching, feedback, and collective efficacy. A study was conducted to determine whether consultative team coaching improves performance and at what point---beginning or middle---it is most beneficial to the team. One hundred eleven dyads, comprised of 222 students, participated in this study. The dyads performed a task twice in which they were given team coaching before the first attempt, after the first attempt, or not at all. In addition, feedback was manipulated such that teams received positive or negative feedback after their first attempt of the task. Each participant filled out questionnaires assessing collective efficacy, group goals, and group cohesiveness at three different times---beginning, middle, and end---over the course of the study. Results indicated there was a significant main effect of team coaching, however it was due to superior performance by groups in the no coaching condition during the first performance period. In addition, there were significant Time x Coaching interactions predicting group cohesiveness and group goals. Overall, collective efficacy was positively related to group goals and group cohesiveness. Furthermore, collective efficacy was positively related to group performance such that group performance influenced the team's collective efficacy. Moreover, team coaching led to strategy improvement. Limitations of current study and implications for further research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0112.
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a Loyola University Chicago. $b Psychology. $3 1669720
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 49-01.
790 1 0 $a Tindale, Robert S., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Mallett, Robyn K. $e committee member
790 $a 0112
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1480876