東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The importance of being a complement...

Jurka, Johannes.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The importance of being a complement: CED effects revisited.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The importance of being a complement: CED effects revisited./
作者:	Jurka, Johannes.
面頁冊數:	248 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-11, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-11A.
標題:	Language, Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3426402
ISBN:	9781124270593

The importance of being a complement: CED effects revisited.
Jurka, Johannes.

The importance of being a complement: CED effects revisited. - 248 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-11, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2010.

This dissertation revisits subject island effects (Ross 1967, Chomsky 1973) cross-linguistically. Controlled acceptability judgment studies in German, English, Japanese and Serbian show that extraction out of specifiers is consistently degraded compared to extraction out of complements, indicating that the Condition on Extraction domains (CED, Huang 1982) is still empirically viable, contrary to recent claims (Stepanov 2007). As a consequence, recent treatments of the CED in terms of Multiple Spell-Out (Uriagereka 1999) are still tenable. First, a series of NP-subextraction experiments in German using was fur-split is discussed. The results indicate that subject island effects cannot be reduced to freezing effects (Wexler & Culicover 1981). Extraction out of in-situ subjects is degraded compared to extraction out of in-situ objects. Freezing incurs an additional cost, i.e., extraction out of moved domains is degraded compared to in-situ domains. Further results from German indicate that extraction out of in-situ unaccusative and passive subjects is en par with extraction out of objects, while extraction out of in-situ transitive and intransitive unergative subjects causes a decrease in acceptability. Additionally, extraction out of indirect objects is degraded compared to extraction out of direct objects. It is also observed that a second gap improves the acceptability of otherwise illicit was fur-split, a phenomenon dubbed Across-the-Board (ATB)-was fur-split and analysed in terms of Sideward Movement (Hornstein & Nunes 2002). Furthermore, wh-extraction out of non-finite sentential arguments also shows a significant subject/object asymmetry. Experiments in English indicate that NP-subextraction yields the familiar subject/object asymmetry, while the contrast largely disappears when PPs are fronted. Further results show that ECM and passive predicates do not improve the acceptability of the extraction out of subjects. Finally, subject subextraction patterns in Japanese and Serbian are investigated. Both Long-distance scrambling and clefting out of sentential subjects in Japanese leads to a stronger degradation than out of sentential objects. PP-extraction in Serbian also shows the same subject/object asymmetry, while no such contrast is found for Left Branch Extraction.

ISBN: 9781124270593Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018079
Language, Linguistics.

The importance of being a complement: CED effects revisited.
LDR:03412nam 2200325 4500 001 1394423
005 20110422103511.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124270593
035 $a (UMI)AAI3426402
035 $a AAI3426402
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Jurka, Johannes. $3 1673049
245 1 4 $a The importance of being a complement: CED effects revisited.
300 $a 248 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-11, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Norbert R. Hornstein.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2010.
520 $a This dissertation revisits subject island effects (Ross 1967, Chomsky 1973) cross-linguistically. Controlled acceptability judgment studies in German, English, Japanese and Serbian show that extraction out of specifiers is consistently degraded compared to extraction out of complements, indicating that the Condition on Extraction domains (CED, Huang 1982) is still empirically viable, contrary to recent claims (Stepanov 2007). As a consequence, recent treatments of the CED in terms of Multiple Spell-Out (Uriagereka 1999) are still tenable. First, a series of NP-subextraction experiments in German using was fur-split is discussed. The results indicate that subject island effects cannot be reduced to freezing effects (Wexler & Culicover 1981). Extraction out of in-situ subjects is degraded compared to extraction out of in-situ objects. Freezing incurs an additional cost, i.e., extraction out of moved domains is degraded compared to in-situ domains. Further results from German indicate that extraction out of in-situ unaccusative and passive subjects is en par with extraction out of objects, while extraction out of in-situ transitive and intransitive unergative subjects causes a decrease in acceptability. Additionally, extraction out of indirect objects is degraded compared to extraction out of direct objects. It is also observed that a second gap improves the acceptability of otherwise illicit was fur-split, a phenomenon dubbed Across-the-Board (ATB)-was fur-split and analysed in terms of Sideward Movement (Hornstein & Nunes 2002). Furthermore, wh-extraction out of non-finite sentential arguments also shows a significant subject/object asymmetry. Experiments in English indicate that NP-subextraction yields the familiar subject/object asymmetry, while the contrast largely disappears when PPs are fronted. Further results show that ECM and passive predicates do not improve the acceptability of the extraction out of subjects. Finally, subject subextraction patterns in Japanese and Serbian are investigated. Both Long-distance scrambling and clefting out of sentential subjects in Japanese leads to a stronger degradation than out of sentential objects. PP-extraction in Serbian also shows the same subject/object asymmetry, while no such contrast is found for Left Branch Extraction.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Language, Modern. $3 1018098
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0291
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Linguistics. $3 1037994
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-11A.
790 1 0 $a Hornstein, Norbert R., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Dwyer, Susan J. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Hacquard, Valentine C. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Uriagereka, Juan $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Weinberg, Amy S. $e committee member
790 $a 0117
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3426402