東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effectiveness of case-based method v...

Carter, Lori D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effectiveness of case-based method versus traditional lecture in the retention of athletic training knowledge.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effectiveness of case-based method versus traditional lecture in the retention of athletic training knowledge./
作者:	Carter, Lori D.
面頁冊數:	154 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06, Section: A, page: 2164.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International56-06A.
標題:	Education, Physical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9535942

Effectiveness of case-based method versus traditional lecture in the retention of athletic training knowledge.
Carter, Lori D.

Effectiveness of case-based method versus traditional lecture in the retention of athletic training knowledge. - 154 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06, Section: A, page: 2164.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oregon State University, 1995.

The use of the case based method of teaching has become widespread in many different professional education programs such as business, medicine, and teacher education. However, controlled experimental research to study the effectiveness of this teaching method is limited and what does exist is inconclusive. In this study the effectiveness of the case method of teaching was compared to traditional lecture in the retention of athletic training knowledge with group discussion included in both methods. In addition, a subjective measure of subjects' level of learning was studied through the use of an attitude questionnaire. Thirty-six undergraduate students who were athletic training majors at the same four year institution volunteered for this study. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: case study, case study with discussion, lecture, and lecture with discussion. The main experimental data utilized a 4 x 2 x 2 (teaching method x injury topic x test time) MANOVA with repeated measures on the last two factors to examine each hypothesis at the.05 level of significance. The dependent variable was a 20 item multiple-choice examination over two athletic training injury topics. Results showed no statistically significant difference between teaching method on the multiple-choice examinations F(3) = 1.11, p =.360. There was also no significant interaction effect of teaching method by injury topic by testing time F(3) =.83, p =.488. The study did show that subjects in the case, case with discussion, and lecture treatment groups scored significantly higher on an immediate post-test compared to a post-test taken four weeks later. However, the subjects in the lecture with discussion treatment showed no significant difference between the two testing times F(1) =.01, p =.934. A subjective measurement of learning was also studied with the use of an attitude questionnaire. Results of the Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance showed no significant difference between teaching method on attitude; chi square(3) = 3.23 p =.3574. The results of this study do not support anecdotal claims that the case method of teaching is more effective than the traditional lecture method of teaching.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018000
Education, Physical.

Effectiveness of case-based method versus traditional lecture in the retention of athletic training knowledge.
LDR:03131nam 2200265 4500 001 1394013
005 20110419112657.5
008 130515s1995 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI9535942
035 $a AAI9535942
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Carter, Lori D. $3 1672598
245 1 0 $a Effectiveness of case-based method versus traditional lecture in the retention of athletic training knowledge.
300 $a 154 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06, Section: A, page: 2164.
500 $a Adviser: Joanne B. Engel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oregon State University, 1995.
520 $a The use of the case based method of teaching has become widespread in many different professional education programs such as business, medicine, and teacher education. However, controlled experimental research to study the effectiveness of this teaching method is limited and what does exist is inconclusive. In this study the effectiveness of the case method of teaching was compared to traditional lecture in the retention of athletic training knowledge with group discussion included in both methods. In addition, a subjective measure of subjects' level of learning was studied through the use of an attitude questionnaire. Thirty-six undergraduate students who were athletic training majors at the same four year institution volunteered for this study. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: case study, case study with discussion, lecture, and lecture with discussion. The main experimental data utilized a 4 x 2 x 2 (teaching method x injury topic x test time) MANOVA with repeated measures on the last two factors to examine each hypothesis at the.05 level of significance. The dependent variable was a 20 item multiple-choice examination over two athletic training injury topics. Results showed no statistically significant difference between teaching method on the multiple-choice examinations F(3) = 1.11, p =.360. There was also no significant interaction effect of teaching method by injury topic by testing time F(3) =.83, p =.488. The study did show that subjects in the case, case with discussion, and lecture treatment groups scored significantly higher on an immediate post-test compared to a post-test taken four weeks later. However, the subjects in the lecture with discussion treatment showed no significant difference between the two testing times F(1) =.01, p =.934. A subjective measurement of learning was also studied with the use of an attitude questionnaire. Results of the Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance showed no significant difference between teaching method on attitude; chi square(3) = 3.23 p =.3574. The results of this study do not support anecdotal claims that the case method of teaching is more effective than the traditional lecture method of teaching.
590 $a School code: 0172.
650 4 $a Education, Physical. $3 1018000
650 4 $a Education, Curriculum and Instruction. $3 576301
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a Oregon State University. $3 625720
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 56-06A.
790 1 0 $a Engel, Joanne B., $e advisor
790 $a 0172
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1995
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9535942