東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Delivery(at)machines: Toward a rheto...

Morey, Sean W.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Delivery(at)machines: Toward a rhetoric and decomposition of new media.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Delivery(at)machines: Toward a rhetoric and decomposition of new media./
作者:	Morey, Sean W.
面頁冊數:	265 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-01, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-01A.
標題:	Multimedia Communications. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3436353
ISBN:	9781124360942

Delivery(at)machines: Toward a rhetoric and decomposition of new media.
Morey, Sean W.

Delivery(at)machines: Toward a rhetoric and decomposition of new media. - 265 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-01, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2010.

Delivery Machines theorizes a new media practice (that is, electrate practice) for the rhetorical canon of delivery. Delivery, in both orality and literacy, has traditionally been undertheorized by scholars of rhetoric, beginning with Aristotle's reticence for the practice of delivery as a whole. This makes sense, given that Aristotle was trying to invent delivery practices pertinent to the technology of alphabetic print, and not rely upon the technologies of the body. Our present situation is analogous to Aristotle's: a new language apparatus, electracy (as developed by Gregory L. Ulmer---the skill set necessary to use all the communicative technologies of new media) is emerging, and new practices, or at least theories, should also emerge to make use of new media technologies. While many scholars in rhetoric and composition studies, or even writing studies in general, attempt to fit new media technologies into the existing logic of literacy, Ulmer notes that each language technology works within a unique language apparatus, and so many scholars of "media literacy" are looking in the wrong places, trying to retrofit the logics developed specifically for alphabetic print to work for a technology that uses print, image, and sound, coupled with the digital internet. Thus, scholars of rhetoric, finding the same problem as Aristotle, try to theorize delivery at the dead end of literacy; that is, they look to understand how the visual aspects of writing become aspects of delivery rather than ask what new kinds of delivery does electracy make possible. Delivery Machines, then, does not attempt to recover the canon of delivery as it was before literacy, but to invent delivery practices specifically for the developing communication apparatus of electracy as understood through the lens of grammatology.

ISBN: 9781124360942Subjects--Topical Terms:

1057801
Multimedia Communications.

Delivery(at)machines: Toward a rhetoric and decomposition of new media.
LDR:02724nam 2200289 4500 001 1393785
005 20110406093057.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124360942
035 $a (UMI)AAI3436353
035 $a AAI3436353
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Morey, Sean W. $3 1672357
245 1 0 $a Delivery(at)machines: Toward a rhetoric and decomposition of new media.
300 $a 265 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-01, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Sidney I. Dobrin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2010.
520 $a Delivery Machines theorizes a new media practice (that is, electrate practice) for the rhetorical canon of delivery. Delivery, in both orality and literacy, has traditionally been undertheorized by scholars of rhetoric, beginning with Aristotle's reticence for the practice of delivery as a whole. This makes sense, given that Aristotle was trying to invent delivery practices pertinent to the technology of alphabetic print, and not rely upon the technologies of the body. Our present situation is analogous to Aristotle's: a new language apparatus, electracy (as developed by Gregory L. Ulmer---the skill set necessary to use all the communicative technologies of new media) is emerging, and new practices, or at least theories, should also emerge to make use of new media technologies. While many scholars in rhetoric and composition studies, or even writing studies in general, attempt to fit new media technologies into the existing logic of literacy, Ulmer notes that each language technology works within a unique language apparatus, and so many scholars of "media literacy" are looking in the wrong places, trying to retrofit the logics developed specifically for alphabetic print to work for a technology that uses print, image, and sound, coupled with the digital internet. Thus, scholars of rhetoric, finding the same problem as Aristotle, try to theorize delivery at the dead end of literacy; that is, they look to understand how the visual aspects of writing become aspects of delivery rather than ask what new kinds of delivery does electracy make possible. Delivery Machines, then, does not attempt to recover the canon of delivery as it was before literacy, but to invent delivery practices specifically for the developing communication apparatus of electracy as understood through the lens of grammatology.
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Multimedia Communications. $3 1057801
650 4 $a Web Studies. $3 1026830
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 1019205
690 $a 0558
690 $a 0646
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a University of Florida. $3 718949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-01A.
790 1 0 $a Dobrin, Sidney I., $e advisor
790 $a 0070
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3436353