東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Patron-Clientism as an anthropologic...

Evans, Douglas Kibbey.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Patron-Clientism as an anthropological model for understanding Israelite social and economic dynamics in the early Settlement Period.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Patron-Clientism as an anthropological model for understanding Israelite social and economic dynamics in the early Settlement Period./
Author:	Evans, Douglas Kibbey.
Description:	199 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 54-08, Section: A, page: 3162.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International54-08A.
Subject:	Religion, Biblical Studies. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9402504

Patron-Clientism as an anthropological model for understanding Israelite social and economic dynamics in the early Settlement Period.
Evans, Douglas Kibbey.

Patron-Clientism as an anthropological model for understanding Israelite social and economic dynamics in the early Settlement Period. - 199 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 54-08, Section: A, page: 3162.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1993.

Judges 5 contains the Song of Deborah, a hymn celebrating the Israelite victory over Canaanite Hazor. Of the ten tribes called, only five responded. Why did five tribes "remain in the hills"? This thesis proposes Patron-Clientism as a socio-economic model for explaining this breach in Israelite solidarity. Patron-Clientism stresses that social ties must exist between non-cognate societies before economic exchange can occur. All five aberrant tribes had all migrated out from the central highlands into regions which were geographically and demographically hostile. These tribes found themselves residing as aliens within areas of Canaanite dominance. However, through fictive and sacral kinship the northern and trans-Jordan tribes had established the social matrices necessary to protect themselves against social and economic exploitation among their stronger Phoenician and Canaanite neighbors. These "border tribes" farthest from the Israelite central tribes could now enjoy economic benefits from their non-Israelite patrons. But these same tribes had also maintained social ties with their Israelite kin. When the war with Hazor began, these five tribes faced polarized obligations to both Israelite and Canaanite patrons. Unable to satisfy duties to both patrons, these tribes chose neutrality. This choice protected them from immediate reprisals, but consequences to their dichotomous Patron-Clientism would continue well into the Monarchic Period.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020189
Religion, Biblical Studies.

Patron-Clientism as an anthropological model for understanding Israelite social and economic dynamics in the early Settlement Period.
LDR:02402nam 2200277 4500 001 1391910
005 20110208131611.5
008 130515s1993 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI9402504
035 $a AAI9402504
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Evans, Douglas Kibbey. $3 1670374
245 1 0 $a Patron-Clientism as an anthropological model for understanding Israelite social and economic dynamics in the early Settlement Period.
300 $a 199 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 54-08, Section: A, page: 3162.
500 $a Major Professor: John Priest.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1993.
520 $a Judges 5 contains the Song of Deborah, a hymn celebrating the Israelite victory over Canaanite Hazor. Of the ten tribes called, only five responded. Why did five tribes "remain in the hills"? This thesis proposes Patron-Clientism as a socio-economic model for explaining this breach in Israelite solidarity. Patron-Clientism stresses that social ties must exist between non-cognate societies before economic exchange can occur. All five aberrant tribes had all migrated out from the central highlands into regions which were geographically and demographically hostile. These tribes found themselves residing as aliens within areas of Canaanite dominance. However, through fictive and sacral kinship the northern and trans-Jordan tribes had established the social matrices necessary to protect themselves against social and economic exploitation among their stronger Phoenician and Canaanite neighbors. These "border tribes" farthest from the Israelite central tribes could now enjoy economic benefits from their non-Israelite patrons. But these same tribes had also maintained social ties with their Israelite kin. When the war with Hazor began, these five tribes faced polarized obligations to both Israelite and Canaanite patrons. Unable to satisfy duties to both patrons, these tribes chose neutrality. This choice protected them from immediate reprisals, but consequences to their dichotomous Patron-Clientism would continue well into the Monarchic Period.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a Religion, Biblical Studies. $3 1020189
650 4 $a Anthropology, Cultural. $3 735016
650 4 $a History, Ancient. $3 516261
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0579
710 2 $a The Florida State University. $3 1017727
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 54-08A.
790 1 0 $a Priest, John, $e advisor
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1993
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9402504