東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Organizational culture, organization...

Wichinsky, Lillian Rindom.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Organizational culture, organizational climate, and collaborative capacity for planning.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Organizational culture, organizational climate, and collaborative capacity for planning./
作者:	Wichinsky, Lillian Rindom.
面頁冊數:	153 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-06, Section: A, page: 2457.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-06A.
標題:	Social Work. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3319015
ISBN:	9780549692263

Organizational culture, organizational climate, and collaborative capacity for planning.
Wichinsky, Lillian Rindom.

Organizational culture, organizational climate, and collaborative capacity for planning. - 153 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-06, Section: A, page: 2457.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida International University, 2008.

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship of organizational culture and organizational climate on participant perceptions of collaborative capacity for planning, within the context of the Florida School Readiness Coalitions (FSRCs). Three hypotheses were proposed for study: First, that organizational culture would be correlated to organizational climate; second, that organizational culture would be correlated to collaborative capacity for planning; and the third that organizational climate would be correlated to collaborative capacity for planning.

ISBN: 9780549692263Subjects--Topical Terms:

617587
Social Work.

Organizational culture, organizational climate, and collaborative capacity for planning.
LDR:03467nam 2200301 4500 001 1391740
005 20110119103304.5
008 130515s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549692263
035 $a (UMI)AAI3319015
035 $a AAI3319015
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Wichinsky, Lillian Rindom. $3 1670189
245 1 0 $a Organizational culture, organizational climate, and collaborative capacity for planning.
300 $a 153 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-06, Section: A, page: 2457.
500 $a Adviser: Barbara Thomlison.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida International University, 2008.
520 $a The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship of organizational culture and organizational climate on participant perceptions of collaborative capacity for planning, within the context of the Florida School Readiness Coalitions (FSRCs). Three hypotheses were proposed for study: First, that organizational culture would be correlated to organizational climate; second, that organizational culture would be correlated to collaborative capacity for planning; and the third that organizational climate would be correlated to collaborative capacity for planning.
520 $a A cross-sectional survey research design was used to obtain data from participants in 25 Florida School Readiness Coalitions. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to examine the association between the dependent variable, collaborative capacity for planning, and the independent variables, organizational culture and climate. Bivariate analyses revealed a significant level of association for five culture indicators to collaborative capacity for planning: motivation, interpersonal, service, supportive and individualistic indicators, and four climate indicators: cooperation, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and role clarity. Findings suggest (a) a constructive culture and positive climate were present within the FSRCs during the period of study and (b) participants perceived that the collaborative capacity for planning existed. Hierarchical multiple regression, controlling for effects of participant demographics, were used to examine the degree to which organizational culture and climate predict collaborative capacity. The culture indicators, supportive and individualistic, and the climate indicator job satisfaction accounted for 46% of the variance in collaborative capacity for planning. No other indicators of the independent variables demonstrated significance. The findings suggests that (a) culture and climate should be studied together, (b) culture and climate are two constructs that may provide knowledge about the way community groups work together, and (c) the collaborative capacity of groups planning services such as the FSRCs may benefit through consideration of how culture and climate affect service planners' relationships, communication, and ability to achieve a mission or goal. Culture and climate may offer social workers new information about internal factors affecting the collaborative process. Further investigation of these constructs with other types of groups is warranted.
590 $a School code: 1023.
650 4 $a Social Work. $3 617587
650 4 $a Sociology, Public and Social Welfare. $3 1017909
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
690 $a 0452
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Florida International University. $3 718935
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-06A.
790 1 0 $a Thomlison, Barbara, $e advisor
790 $a 1023
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3319015