東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Conceptual Understanding of Linear R...

Manley, Melissa M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Conceptual Understanding of Linear Relationships Across Various Mathematics Courses.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Conceptual Understanding of Linear Relationships Across Various Mathematics Courses./
作者:	Manley, Melissa M.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	219 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-11B.
標題:	Mathematics education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31297624
ISBN:	9798382750477

Conceptual Understanding of Linear Relationships Across Various Mathematics Courses.
Manley, Melissa M.

Conceptual Understanding of Linear Relationships Across Various Mathematics Courses. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 219 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2024.

This cross-sectional study investigated the conceptual understanding of linear relationships for 195 students enrolled in a single school in a large, urban district across five mathematics courses: Grade 7 Math (n = 24), Grade 8 Math (n = 52), Geometry (n = 43), Algebra 1 (n = 31), and Algebra 2 (n = 45). The following questions guided this study: (1) What differences exist in students' conceptual understanding of linear relationships across mathematics courses? (2) What are common strengths and weaknesses in students' conceptual understanding of linear relationships?An assessment was created to assess three constructs of conceptual understanding of linear relationships: (1) Identifying unit rates in proportional relationships, (2) Moving fluidly between representations of the same linear relationships, and (3) Interpreting different representations of linear relationships. The assessment contained eight multiple-choice items and seven free-response items, with five items assessing each construct. Each student completed the assessment in their regular mathematics course in a single class period. The assessment was scored and analyzed by mathematics course.The overall test score and the score on each construct were analyzed using an ANOVA with Tukey and Games-Howell post hoc analyses. A significant difference was found in overall understanding of linear relationships across courses. The difference existed between students enrolled in the follow mathematics courses: Grade 7 Math and Algebra 2, Grade 7 Math and Geometry, and Grade 8 Math and Algebra 2. Results also highlighted a significant difference between Grade 7 Math and Algebra 2 students in all three linear relationship constructs, with Algebra 2 students scoring significantly higher than Grade 7 Math students. Overall, students did not demonstrate a strong understanding of linear relationships, although Algebra 2 students were the most successful. The area in which students in all mathematics courses showed the greatest understanding was calculating unit rates in familiar contexts (e.g. speed, units per hour). Areas of weakness included interpreting linear relationships from any representation (e.g. table, graph, equation, verbal description) and moving fluidly between representations of linear relationships.The results of this study suggested that students need to be given more opportunities to engage in learning experiences where they are interpreting multiple representations of the same linear relationship across all mathematics courses. Students should be asked to translate between tables, graphs, equations, and verbal representations of linear relationships in all directions (e.g., table to equation, verbal to equation, equation to graph). Curricular materials and learning experiences that only ask students to translate in select familiar directions between representations (e.g., table to graph, equation to graph) may be contributing to inequitable mathematics learning experiences and outcomes. Engaging in learning experiences in all directions and with all representations of linear relationships should help increase students' conceptual understanding of linear relationships. Effectively implementing conceptual-based curricular materials along with research-based best teaching practices will help provide a more equitable mathematics experience for all students.

ISBN: 9798382750477Subjects--Topical Terms:

641129
Mathematics education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Linear relationships

Conceptual Understanding of Linear Relationships Across Various Mathematics Courses.
LDR:04523nmm a2200373 4500 001 2398252
005 20240812064415.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382750477
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31297624
035 $a AAI31297624
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Manley, Melissa M. $3 3768168
245 1 0 $a Conceptual Understanding of Linear Relationships Across Various Mathematics Courses.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 219 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Huinker, DeAnn.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2024.
520 $a This cross-sectional study investigated the conceptual understanding of linear relationships for 195 students enrolled in a single school in a large, urban district across five mathematics courses: Grade 7 Math (n = 24), Grade 8 Math (n = 52), Geometry (n = 43), Algebra 1 (n = 31), and Algebra 2 (n = 45). The following questions guided this study: (1) What differences exist in students' conceptual understanding of linear relationships across mathematics courses? (2) What are common strengths and weaknesses in students' conceptual understanding of linear relationships?An assessment was created to assess three constructs of conceptual understanding of linear relationships: (1) Identifying unit rates in proportional relationships, (2) Moving fluidly between representations of the same linear relationships, and (3) Interpreting different representations of linear relationships. The assessment contained eight multiple-choice items and seven free-response items, with five items assessing each construct. Each student completed the assessment in their regular mathematics course in a single class period. The assessment was scored and analyzed by mathematics course.The overall test score and the score on each construct were analyzed using an ANOVA with Tukey and Games-Howell post hoc analyses. A significant difference was found in overall understanding of linear relationships across courses. The difference existed between students enrolled in the follow mathematics courses: Grade 7 Math and Algebra 2, Grade 7 Math and Geometry, and Grade 8 Math and Algebra 2. Results also highlighted a significant difference between Grade 7 Math and Algebra 2 students in all three linear relationship constructs, with Algebra 2 students scoring significantly higher than Grade 7 Math students. Overall, students did not demonstrate a strong understanding of linear relationships, although Algebra 2 students were the most successful. The area in which students in all mathematics courses showed the greatest understanding was calculating unit rates in familiar contexts (e.g. speed, units per hour). Areas of weakness included interpreting linear relationships from any representation (e.g. table, graph, equation, verbal description) and moving fluidly between representations of linear relationships.The results of this study suggested that students need to be given more opportunities to engage in learning experiences where they are interpreting multiple representations of the same linear relationship across all mathematics courses. Students should be asked to translate between tables, graphs, equations, and verbal representations of linear relationships in all directions (e.g., table to equation, verbal to equation, equation to graph). Curricular materials and learning experiences that only ask students to translate in select familiar directions between representations (e.g., table to graph, equation to graph) may be contributing to inequitable mathematics learning experiences and outcomes. Engaging in learning experiences in all directions and with all representations of linear relationships should help increase students' conceptual understanding of linear relationships. Effectively implementing conceptual-based curricular materials along with research-based best teaching practices will help provide a more equitable mathematics experience for all students.
590 $a School code: 0263.
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Mathematics. $3 515831
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
653 $a Linear relationships
653 $a Mathematics courses
653 $a Learning experiences
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0405
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0443
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee. $b Urban Education. $3 2105301
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-11B.
790 $a 0263
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31297624