Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Great (syntactic) expectations: Mul...
~
Wilson, Michael.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Great (syntactic) expectations: Multiple structures and the case for parallelism in language processing.
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Great (syntactic) expectations: Multiple structures and the case for parallelism in language processing./
Author:
Wilson, Michael.
Description:
103 p.
Notes:
Adviser: Susan M. Garnsey.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International67-07B.
Subject:
Language, Linguistics. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3223750
ISBN:
9780542777615
Great (syntactic) expectations: Multiple structures and the case for parallelism in language processing.
Wilson, Michael.
Great (syntactic) expectations: Multiple structures and the case for parallelism in language processing.
- 103 p.
Adviser: Susan M. Garnsey.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006.
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) are used to address a controversial issue in language-processing research, namely whether the parser proposes more than one possibility for how a sentence will continue. Relatively little research has used ERPs to answer this question, and previous studies have examined brain responses at a point in the sentence when competing theories would make similar predictions. In two experiments, sentences were presented to participants like The claim that the cop shot the informant might have affected the jury. At shot, these sentences continue as preferred plausible complement clauses. If comprehenders are considering a relative clause, however, this will become implausible at shot (*The claim that the cop shot...). According to serial models, only one interpretation---usually the preferred one---will be selected, and thus plausibility in the relative clause version shouldn't matter. The results show a consistent N400 effect at verbs like shot, suggesting that even though sentences continue plausibly in a way that comprehenders expect, they are nonetheless considering the dispreferred relative clause. These results support parallel interactive models.
ISBN: 9780542777615Subjects--Topical Terms:
1018079
Language, Linguistics.
Great (syntactic) expectations: Multiple structures and the case for parallelism in language processing.
LDR
:02173nam 2200301 a 45
001
970540
005
20110921
008
110921s2006 eng d
020
$a
9780542777615
035
$a
(UMI)AAI3223750
035
$a
AAI3223750
040
$a
UMI
$c
UMI
100
1
$a
Wilson, Michael.
$3
899730
245
1 0
$a
Great (syntactic) expectations: Multiple structures and the case for parallelism in language processing.
300
$a
103 p.
500
$a
Adviser: Susan M. Garnsey.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-07, Section: B, page: 4130.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006.
520
$a
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) are used to address a controversial issue in language-processing research, namely whether the parser proposes more than one possibility for how a sentence will continue. Relatively little research has used ERPs to answer this question, and previous studies have examined brain responses at a point in the sentence when competing theories would make similar predictions. In two experiments, sentences were presented to participants like The claim that the cop shot the informant might have affected the jury. At shot, these sentences continue as preferred plausible complement clauses. If comprehenders are considering a relative clause, however, this will become implausible at shot (*The claim that the cop shot...). According to serial models, only one interpretation---usually the preferred one---will be selected, and thus plausibility in the relative clause version shouldn't matter. The results show a consistent N400 effect at verbs like shot, suggesting that even though sentences continue plausibly in a way that comprehenders expect, they are nonetheless considering the dispreferred relative clause. These results support parallel interactive models.
590
$a
School code: 0090.
650
4
$a
Language, Linguistics.
$3
1018079
650
4
$a
Psychology, Cognitive.
$3
1017810
650
4
$a
Psychology, Experimental.
$3
517106
650
4
$a
Psychology, Psychobiology.
$3
1017821
690
$a
0290
690
$a
0349
690
$a
0623
690
$a
0633
710
2 0
$a
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
$3
626646
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
67-07B.
790
$a
0090
790
1 0
$a
Garnsey, Susan M.,
$e
advisor
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2006
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3223750
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9129028
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB W9129028
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login