東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Interpretive reliability of six comp...

Deskovitz, Mark.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Interpretive reliability of six computer-based test interpretation programs for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Interpretive reliability of six computer-based test interpretation programs for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2./
Author:	Deskovitz, Mark.
Description:	84 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Nathan Weed.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-07B.
Subject:	Psychology, Clinical. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3182680
ISBN:	9780542238161

Interpretive reliability of six computer-based test interpretation programs for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2.
Deskovitz, Mark.

Interpretive reliability of six computer-based test interpretation programs for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. - 84 p.

Adviser: Nathan Weed.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Central Michigan University, 2005.

The use of Computer-Based Test Interpretation (CBTI) of psychological tests has increased in recent years. This study evaluated the "interpretive reliability" of six commercially available CBTI programs for interpreting the MMPI-2, the most widely used psychological test, using a novel q-sort methodology. More specifically, this study addressed two major aspects of CBTI reliability: inter-program reliability was assessed by observing the similarity of q-sort ratings across programs; inter-interpreter reliability was addressed by observing the similarity of q-sort ratings across raters.

ISBN: 9780542238161Subjects--Topical Terms:

524864
Psychology, Clinical.

Interpretive reliability of six computer-based test interpretation programs for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2.
LDR:03239nam 2200313 a 45 001 969834
005 20110920
008 110921s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542238161
035 $a (UnM)AAI3182680
035 $a AAI3182680
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Deskovitz, Mark. $3 1293890
245 1 0 $a Interpretive reliability of six computer-based test interpretation programs for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2.
300 $a 84 p.
500 $a Adviser: Nathan Weed.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-07, Section: B, page: 3944.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Central Michigan University, 2005.
520 $a The use of Computer-Based Test Interpretation (CBTI) of psychological tests has increased in recent years. This study evaluated the "interpretive reliability" of six commercially available CBTI programs for interpreting the MMPI-2, the most widely used psychological test, using a novel q-sort methodology. More specifically, this study addressed two major aspects of CBTI reliability: inter-program reliability was assessed by observing the similarity of q-sort ratings across programs; inter-interpreter reliability was addressed by observing the similarity of q-sort ratings across raters.
520 $a It was found that there were no significant differences overall between the CBTIs or between profiles with regard to inter-interpreter reliability. There were specific CBTI/profile combinations that were interpreted with less consensus (e.g., the CBTI by Automated Assessment Associates on a within normal limits profile). With regard to inter-program reliability, there were no significant differences overall between the CBTIs, but there were overall differences between the profiles (e.g., the 4/9 and 1/2/3 profiles were interpreted with greater consistency while the 2/4 and 7/8 profiles were interpreted with less consensus). In addition there were specific CBTI profile combinations that were interpreted with more and less consensus (e.g., 4/9 profile interpreted by Pearson Assessments was most consensual with the other reports, while the 2/4 profile interpreted by Automated Assessment Associates was least consensual with the other reports).
520 $a Inter-program reliability was recalculated after an attempt to correct for redundancy across profiles. Again, after correction there were no general differences in reliability for CBTIs but there were differences between profiles (the 4/9, 8/9 and WNL profiles were most consensual, while the 2/4 and 8/9 profiles were least consensual).
520 $a Results suggest that these commercially available MMPI-2 CBTIs show similar levels of overall inter-program and inter-interpreter reliability. However, users should be alert to the possibility that certain MMPI-2 profiles are interpreted more or less consensually and that some CBTIs may show variable reliability in their interpretation depending on the MMPI-2 profile type.
590 $a School code: 6006.
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a Central Michigan University. $3 1019276
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-07B.
790 $a 6006
790 1 0 $a Weed, Nathan, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3182680