東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A formative program evaluation of Br...

Allen, Maria Sue.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A formative program evaluation of Bridgepointe's Great Expectations .

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A formative program evaluation of Bridgepointe's Great Expectations ./
作者:	Allen, Maria Sue.
面頁冊數:	90 p.
附註:	Adviser: Diane Wohlfarth.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-12B.
標題:	Education, Vocational. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3243809

A formative program evaluation of Bridgepointe's Great Expectations .
Allen, Maria Sue.

A formative program evaluation of Bridgepointe's Great Expectations . - 90 p.

Adviser: Diane Wohlfarth.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Spalding University, 2007.

This dissertation is a formative program evaluation of Bridgepointe Goodwill's Career Services Division's Great Expectations (GE). GE is an annual week-long summer youth camp begun in the year 2002, which is geared towards exposing youth in the Southern Indiana area ages fourteen to eighteen to the world of work. The program originally targeted disadvantaged or impoverished youth, in order to help stop the cycle of welfare by giving youth the skills they need to find employment in young adulthood; however, GE is now open to all high school students and tries to target a diverse population. This program evaluation focused on developing a comprehensive description of GE, including the creation of a logic model, and developing tools which the program can use to measure outcomes for continued evaluation. The methodology included collecting archival data from the Director of Career Services and the Director of GE at Bridgepointe Goodwill, conducting interviews with the staff involved with planning and implementing GE, as well as ongoing meetings with the Director of Career Services and the Director of GE to ensure accuracy. This program evaluation resulted in a logic model of the program, which is a comprehensive outline of the basic assumptions, the primary activities, and the short and long-term goals of GE. From this model four methods of outcome measurement were formed: Staff-Rated Participant Progress Form, Participant Exit Survey, Guardian Exit Survey, and Six Month/One Year Follow-Up Survey. These outcome measures may be used by GE to track how well the program is meeting its short and long-term goals, in order to help the program ensure quality and identify specific areas which need improvement.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017499
Education, Vocational.

A formative program evaluation of Bridgepointe's Great Expectations .
LDR:02569nam 2200265 a 45 001 969402
005 20110920
008 110921s2007 eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3243809
035 $a AAI3243809
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Allen, Maria Sue. $3 1293455
245 1 2 $a A formative program evaluation of Bridgepointe's Great Expectations .
300 $a 90 p.
500 $a Adviser: Diane Wohlfarth.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-12, Section: B, page: 7362.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Spalding University, 2007.
520 $a This dissertation is a formative program evaluation of Bridgepointe Goodwill's Career Services Division's Great Expectations (GE). GE is an annual week-long summer youth camp begun in the year 2002, which is geared towards exposing youth in the Southern Indiana area ages fourteen to eighteen to the world of work. The program originally targeted disadvantaged or impoverished youth, in order to help stop the cycle of welfare by giving youth the skills they need to find employment in young adulthood; however, GE is now open to all high school students and tries to target a diverse population. This program evaluation focused on developing a comprehensive description of GE, including the creation of a logic model, and developing tools which the program can use to measure outcomes for continued evaluation. The methodology included collecting archival data from the Director of Career Services and the Director of GE at Bridgepointe Goodwill, conducting interviews with the staff involved with planning and implementing GE, as well as ongoing meetings with the Director of Career Services and the Director of GE to ensure accuracy. This program evaluation resulted in a logic model of the program, which is a comprehensive outline of the basic assumptions, the primary activities, and the short and long-term goals of GE. From this model four methods of outcome measurement were formed: Staff-Rated Participant Progress Form, Participant Exit Survey, Guardian Exit Survey, and Six Month/One Year Follow-Up Survey. These outcome measures may be used by GE to track how well the program is meeting its short and long-term goals, in order to help the program ensure quality and identify specific areas which need improvement.
590 $a School code: 0965.
650 4 $a Education, Vocational. $3 1017499
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0747
710 2 0 $a Spalding University. $3 1019232
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-12B.
790 $a 0965
790 1 0 $a Wohlfarth, Diane, $e advisor
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3243809