東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Clio's drumbeat: Gathering and using...

Jennings, Patrick R.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clio's drumbeat: Gathering and using history in wartime.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Clio's drumbeat: Gathering and using history in wartime./
Author:	Jennings, Patrick R.
Description:	285 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Theodore Karamanski.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-04A.
Subject:	History, Military. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3212971
ISBN:	9780542629440

Clio's drumbeat: Gathering and using history in wartime.
Jennings, Patrick R.

Clio's drumbeat: Gathering and using history in wartime. - 285 p.

Adviser: Theodore Karamanski.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loyola University Chicago, 2006.

Beginning with early colonial military experiences, American soldiers be they militia or regular, have sought to learn from the hard-earned lessons of battle. This process, occasionally burdened by a lack of military professionalism and an adherence to a near-mythological heritage, has grown from a personal and informal system of passing lessons from soldier to soldier to a highly regimented system of documenting combat operations for near instantaneous lessons learned and long-term study. Through analysis of diaries, military regulations, archival documents, and interviews with soldiers and leaders in the development of field and combat history procedures, this dissertation investigates the complex process through which the current system of documenting operations and saving US military history came into being, the conflicting narratives between operational history and military heritage, and, ultimately, the ways that the U.S. Army still relies on both an unofficial, informal system and a growing, well-defined doctrine for utilizing history. This dissertation argues that the early failures in the informal system were less a matter of how history was remembered and more a result of a lack of professionalism in the officer corps while the successes in the sanctioned collection of combat history are based on a growing acceptance of the importance of having soldiers who are also academically trained historians in the area of operations. This study illuminates the ways that military success and failure are inevitably incorporated into the official combat doctrine and unofficial heritage of the U.S. Army and thus into the very consciousness of service, citizenship and nationhood.

ISBN: 9780542629440Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019083
History, Military.

Clio's drumbeat: Gathering and using history in wartime.
LDR:02595nam 2200289 a 45 001 969055
005 20110920
008 110921s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542629440
035 $a (UMI)AAI3212971
035 $a AAI3212971
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Jennings, Patrick R. $3 1293111
245 1 0 $a Clio's drumbeat: Gathering and using history in wartime.
300 $a 285 p.
500 $a Adviser: Theodore Karamanski.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-04, Section: A, page: 1498.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loyola University Chicago, 2006.
520 $a Beginning with early colonial military experiences, American soldiers be they militia or regular, have sought to learn from the hard-earned lessons of battle. This process, occasionally burdened by a lack of military professionalism and an adherence to a near-mythological heritage, has grown from a personal and informal system of passing lessons from soldier to soldier to a highly regimented system of documenting combat operations for near instantaneous lessons learned and long-term study. Through analysis of diaries, military regulations, archival documents, and interviews with soldiers and leaders in the development of field and combat history procedures, this dissertation investigates the complex process through which the current system of documenting operations and saving US military history came into being, the conflicting narratives between operational history and military heritage, and, ultimately, the ways that the U.S. Army still relies on both an unofficial, informal system and a growing, well-defined doctrine for utilizing history. This dissertation argues that the early failures in the informal system were less a matter of how history was remembered and more a result of a lack of professionalism in the officer corps while the successes in the sanctioned collection of combat history are based on a growing acceptance of the importance of having soldiers who are also academically trained historians in the area of operations. This study illuminates the ways that military success and failure are inevitably incorporated into the official combat doctrine and unofficial heritage of the U.S. Army and thus into the very consciousness of service, citizenship and nationhood.
590 $a School code: 0112.
650 4 $a History, Military. $3 1019083
650 4 $a History, Modern. $3 516334
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0582
690 $a 0722
710 2 0 $a Loyola University Chicago. $3 1020295
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-04A.
790 $a 0112
790 1 0 $a Karamanski, Theodore, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3212971