東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Ways of war and the American experie...

Ehrman, James M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ways of war and the American experience in the China-Burma-India theater, 1942--1945.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ways of war and the American experience in the China-Burma-India theater, 1942--1945./
作者:	Ehrman, James M.
面頁冊數:	446 p.
附註:	Adviser: Mark Parillo.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-09A.
標題:	History, Military. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3234499
ISBN:	9780542879074

Ways of war and the American experience in the China-Burma-India theater, 1942--1945.
Ehrman, James M.

Ways of war and the American experience in the China-Burma-India theater, 1942--1945. - 446 p.

Adviser: Mark Parillo.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Kansas State University, 2006.

In 1973 Russell Weigley advanced one of the most prominent and controversial interpretations of U.S. military history. In his book The American Way of War Weigley argues that up to the Civil War the United States utilized a strategy of attrition and exhaustion when threatened by a foreign enemy with greater economic resources. During the Civil War Union commanders, backed by the impressive economic power of Northern industries and a numerically superior Union Army, embraced a strategy of annihilation. Since the Civil War the strategy of annihilation has, according to Weigley, typified the American approach to war. Weigley's thesis, however, does not provide an entirely satisfactory interpretation of U.S. activities in the China-Burma-Indian Theater (CBI) during the Second World War. In sharp contract to U.S. forces stationed in Europe and the Pacific, American forces in the CBI operated in relative logistical poverty. Efforts by American forces to build India into a viable base from which to project Allied power and support China had some of the logistical hallmarks of the American way of war described by Weigley. American efforts to exploit local resources and the logistical austerity that characterized much of the American experience in the theater, however, are not consistent with Weigley's thesis. The U.S. Army's experience in the CBI suggests that the American experience in the CBI is perhaps best described as a fusion between the "American way of war" posited by Weigley and other, alternative "ways of war" American forces have utilized in instances where they did not enjoy overwhelming material support. The American experience in the CBI also suggests that American forces were highly pragmatic, innovative, and capable of adapting their methods to the less than ideal logistical circumstances that characterized the American experience in the CBI.

ISBN: 9780542879074Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019083
History, Military.

Ways of war and the American experience in the China-Burma-India theater, 1942--1945.
LDR:02768nam 2200277 a 45 001 967051
005 20110915
008 110915s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542879074
035 $a (UnM)AAI3234499
035 $a AAI3234499
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Ehrman, James M. $3 1290938
245 1 0 $a Ways of war and the American experience in the China-Burma-India theater, 1942--1945.
300 $a 446 p.
500 $a Adviser: Mark Parillo.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-09, Section: A, page: 3554.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Kansas State University, 2006.
520 $a In 1973 Russell Weigley advanced one of the most prominent and controversial interpretations of U.S. military history. In his book The American Way of War Weigley argues that up to the Civil War the United States utilized a strategy of attrition and exhaustion when threatened by a foreign enemy with greater economic resources. During the Civil War Union commanders, backed by the impressive economic power of Northern industries and a numerically superior Union Army, embraced a strategy of annihilation. Since the Civil War the strategy of annihilation has, according to Weigley, typified the American approach to war. Weigley's thesis, however, does not provide an entirely satisfactory interpretation of U.S. activities in the China-Burma-Indian Theater (CBI) during the Second World War. In sharp contract to U.S. forces stationed in Europe and the Pacific, American forces in the CBI operated in relative logistical poverty. Efforts by American forces to build India into a viable base from which to project Allied power and support China had some of the logistical hallmarks of the American way of war described by Weigley. American efforts to exploit local resources and the logistical austerity that characterized much of the American experience in the theater, however, are not consistent with Weigley's thesis. The U.S. Army's experience in the CBI suggests that the American experience in the CBI is perhaps best described as a fusion between the "American way of war" posited by Weigley and other, alternative "ways of war" American forces have utilized in instances where they did not enjoy overwhelming material support. The American experience in the CBI also suggests that American forces were highly pragmatic, innovative, and capable of adapting their methods to the less than ideal logistical circumstances that characterized the American experience in the CBI.
590 $a School code: 0100.
650 4 $a History, Military. $3 1019083
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0722
710 2 0 $a Kansas State University. $3 1017593
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-09A.
790 $a 0100
790 1 0 $a Parillo, Mark, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3234499