東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Bridging jurisdictional divides: Col...

Gaden, Marc Edward.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Bridging jurisdictional divides: Collective action through a Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Bridging jurisdictional divides: Collective action through a Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries./
作者:	Gaden, Marc Edward.
面頁冊數:	296 p.
附註:	Adviser: Barry G. Rabe.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-02A.
標題:	Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3253270

Bridging jurisdictional divides: Collective action through a Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries.
Gaden, Marc Edward.

Bridging jurisdictional divides: Collective action through a Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries. - 296 p.

Adviser: Barry G. Rabe.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2007.

Ontario, eight Great Lakes states, U.S. tribes, federal agencies in Canada and the United States, and the binational Great Lakes Fishery Commission all have a role in Great Lakes fishery management, with the non-federal governments retaining primary management authority. This dissertation is about how and why independent (yet interdependent) fishery managers work collectively through A Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries , a non-binding agreement. This research focuses on what the Joint Strategic Plan means to those who participate in the process and relies primarily on semi-structured interviews and participant observation to address the central questions: Why do fishery managers take collective action in Great Lakes fishery management? What do fishery managers hope to achieve when they participate in the Joint Strategic Plan?Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020913
Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture.

Bridging jurisdictional divides: Collective action through a Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries.
LDR:03328nam 2200301 a 45 001 965518
005 20110906
008 110906s2007 eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3253270
035 $a AAI3253270
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Gaden, Marc Edward. $3 1288291
245 1 0 $a Bridging jurisdictional divides: Collective action through a Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries.
300 $a 296 p.
500 $a Adviser: Barry G. Rabe.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-02, Section: A, page: 0709.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2007.
520 $a Ontario, eight Great Lakes states, U.S. tribes, federal agencies in Canada and the United States, and the binational Great Lakes Fishery Commission all have a role in Great Lakes fishery management, with the non-federal governments retaining primary management authority. This dissertation is about how and why independent (yet interdependent) fishery managers work collectively through A Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries , a non-binding agreement. This research focuses on what the Joint Strategic Plan means to those who participate in the process and relies primarily on semi-structured interviews and participant observation to address the central questions: Why do fishery managers take collective action in Great Lakes fishery management? What do fishery managers hope to achieve when they participate in the Joint Strategic Plan?
520 $a The data reveal four facets of Great Lakes fishery management that help explain how and why collective action occurs. First, the history of Great Lakes fishery management illustrates that the non-federal governments have a strong sense of jurisdictional independence, which has made them sensitive to usurpation of their authority and thus somewhat reluctant to cooperate with each other. Second, fishery managers are part of an "epistemic community," a group of like-minded professionals, and the Joint Strategic Plan gently coerces this community into working together and substantially rewards them for doing so. Third, despite long-standing tensions between the federal and non-federal governments, the non-federal members generally trust their federal counterparts and work with them synergistically. Finally, members reject the idea of a binding agreement because it would be inconsistent with Great Lakes fishery governance and because they feel they can achieve their goals through a non-binding agreement. These conclusions are applied to a case study---a dispute over walleye harvest in Lake Erie in 2004---as a way to illustrate how members believe the plan serves their needs even in stressful situations. This dissertation concludes by identifying four overarching themes related to fishery governance through the plan---jurisdictional independence, shared strategies and plans, science, and personal relationships---and discusses how those factors relate to the plan's durability and replicability.
590 $a School code: 0127.
650 4 $a Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture. $3 1020913
650 4 $a History, Modern. $3 516334
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0582
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0792
710 2 0 $a University of Michigan. $3 777416
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-02A.
790 $a 0127
790 1 0 $a Rabe, Barry G., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3253270