東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Technological R&D project portfolio ...

Bitman, William Robert.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Technological R&D project portfolio management for sustained competitive advantage: An integrative multi-criteria decision making framework.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Technological R&D project portfolio management for sustained competitive advantage: An integrative multi-criteria decision making framework./
作者:	Bitman, William Robert.
面頁冊數:	152 p.
附註:	Adviser: Nawaz Sharif.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-03A.
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3213082
ISBN:	9780542622441

Technological R&D project portfolio management for sustained competitive advantage: An integrative multi-criteria decision making framework.
Bitman, William Robert.

Technological R&D project portfolio management for sustained competitive advantage: An integrative multi-criteria decision making framework. - 152 p.

Adviser: Nawaz Sharif.

Thesis (D.M.)--University of Maryland University College, 2006.

Some successful technologically-based firms that are committed to original research and development (R&D) develop a growing tendency to prefer incremental projects, often to the exclusion of revolutionary projects. Analysts have cited this management decision behavior as a major cause of a firm's inability to sustain competitive advantage when followed over a prolonged period of time. A conceptual framework was developed to encourage decision makers to include both incremental and revolutionary projects in their R&D portfolio. The core elements of the conceptual framework are the four dimensions for sustaining competitive advantage: competitiveness, innovativeness, attractiveness, and responsiveness. Each dimension contains decision criteria by which to evaluate projects. These criteria include the readiness of the firm to perform the project in terms of the four technological components: technoware (tools), humanware (skills), inforware (facts), and orgaware (methods), as well as a project's capacity to improve the firm's capability (efficiency) and competency (effectiveness). The framework is operationalized as a toolset that facilitates management practice. The toolset includes (a) a project evaluation form which contains, for each criterion, a list of descriptive values spread across a scale which is uniform for all criteria; (b) a set of pairwise comparison matrices with which to assign the relative importance of each criterion; (c) a weighted scoring model that combines scores and weights to rank projects; and (d) radar diagrams that provide feedback. A firm can adjust the values of the scale so that the toolset will produce a rank ordered list of projects having a desired mix of attributes. This research also addressed a generalized process for developing multi-criteria management decision making frameworks. A field study was conducted in which R&D program managers from different firms (including both profit and not-for-profit) representing a wide variety of competitive environments utilized the framework for a sample of their R&D projects. Field study participants found that use of the framework improved the decision process in terms of objectivity, consistency, transparency, accountability, and traceability. It also enabled them to better appreciate the value of many of their projects.

ISBN: 9780542622441Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

Technological R&D project portfolio management for sustained competitive advantage: An integrative multi-criteria decision making framework.
LDR:03311nam 2200289 a 45 001 964200
005 20110901
008 110901s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542622441
035 $a (UMI)AAI3213082
035 $a AAI3213082
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Bitman, William Robert. $3 1287268
245 1 0 $a Technological R&D project portfolio management for sustained competitive advantage: An integrative multi-criteria decision making framework.
300 $a 152 p.
500 $a Adviser: Nawaz Sharif.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-03, Section: A, page: 1001.
502 $a Thesis (D.M.)--University of Maryland University College, 2006.
520 $a Some successful technologically-based firms that are committed to original research and development (R&D) develop a growing tendency to prefer incremental projects, often to the exclusion of revolutionary projects. Analysts have cited this management decision behavior as a major cause of a firm's inability to sustain competitive advantage when followed over a prolonged period of time. A conceptual framework was developed to encourage decision makers to include both incremental and revolutionary projects in their R&D portfolio. The core elements of the conceptual framework are the four dimensions for sustaining competitive advantage: competitiveness, innovativeness, attractiveness, and responsiveness. Each dimension contains decision criteria by which to evaluate projects. These criteria include the readiness of the firm to perform the project in terms of the four technological components: technoware (tools), humanware (skills), inforware (facts), and orgaware (methods), as well as a project's capacity to improve the firm's capability (efficiency) and competency (effectiveness). The framework is operationalized as a toolset that facilitates management practice. The toolset includes (a) a project evaluation form which contains, for each criterion, a list of descriptive values spread across a scale which is uniform for all criteria; (b) a set of pairwise comparison matrices with which to assign the relative importance of each criterion; (c) a weighted scoring model that combines scores and weights to rank projects; and (d) radar diagrams that provide feedback. A firm can adjust the values of the scale so that the toolset will produce a rank ordered list of projects having a desired mix of attributes. This research also addressed a generalized process for developing multi-criteria management decision making frameworks. A field study was conducted in which R&D program managers from different firms (including both profit and not-for-profit) representing a wide variety of competitive environments utilized the framework for a sample of their R&D projects. Field study participants found that use of the framework improved the decision process in terms of objectivity, consistency, transparency, accountability, and traceability. It also enabled them to better appreciate the value of many of their projects.
590 $a School code: 1487.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Engineering, System Science. $3 1018128
650 4 $a Operations Research. $3 626629
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0790
690 $a 0796
710 2 0 $a University of Maryland University College. $3 1287269
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-03A.
790 $a 1487
790 1 0 $a Sharif, Nawaz, $e advisor
791 $a D.M.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3213082