東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Teaching college literature: Educat...

Lint, Bradley Joseph.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Teaching college literature: Educational alignment and literature pedagogy.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Teaching college literature: Educational alignment and literature pedagogy./
作者:	Lint, Bradley Joseph.
面頁冊數:	362 p.
附註:	Adviser: James M. Cahalan.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-02A.
標題:	Education, Language and Literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3303105
ISBN:	9780549494119

Teaching college literature: Educational alignment and literature pedagogy.
Lint, Bradley Joseph.

Teaching college literature: Educational alignment and literature pedagogy. - 362 p.

Adviser: James M. Cahalan.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2008.

This project reconceptualizes the teaching of literature in American colleges and universities from the purview of the concept of educational alignment, which describes the correlation of educational objectives, methods, and assessments. The history of literature pedagogy is discussed in terms of discrete classical, philological, and critical phases that include such disparate approaches as classicism, impressionism, philology, evangelism, New Criticism, reader response, and the host of other conceptual frameworks presently known as "theory." The historical analysis clearly demonstrates a proclivity for teacher-centered instruction, preoccupation with text selection, and a tendency to blame student ignorance for failed pedagogy. Although there have been numerous advances in textual formatting, selection, and pairing, a model of literary knowledge based upon interpretive, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge provides a far more viable model of curricular content than merely sets of literary texts. The "knowledge model," in turn, makes possible the articulation of specific and measurable cognitive objectives for literature pedagogy as well as affective objectives with links to MI (multiple intelligences) theory and emotional intelligence. Since theory versus practice represents a false dichotomy, the latter is considered an outgrowth of the former. Teacher-centered literature teaching methods based on direct instruction are explained in terms of behaviorism and reflect perennialist and essentialist philosophies of education: learner-centered literature strategies such as discussion and cooperative learning, on the other hand, are firmly rooted in constructivism and reflect existential and progressive educational philosophies. I argue that the former has analogues in formalism, and the latter in reader response. Traditional assessments such as exams, journals, research papers, and presentations are transformed into portfolios, multigenre papers, and performance. The project concludes with a number of recommendations for further research and professional development.

ISBN: 9780549494119Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018115
Education, Language and Literature.

Teaching college literature: Educational alignment and literature pedagogy.
LDR:03009nam 2200277 a 45 001 962972
005 20110830
008 110831s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549494119
035 $a (UMI)AAI3303105
035 $a AAI3303105
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Lint, Bradley Joseph. $3 1286032
245 1 0 $a Teaching college literature: Educational alignment and literature pedagogy.
300 $a 362 p.
500 $a Adviser: James M. Cahalan.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-02, Section: A, page: 0601.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2008.
520 $a This project reconceptualizes the teaching of literature in American colleges and universities from the purview of the concept of educational alignment, which describes the correlation of educational objectives, methods, and assessments. The history of literature pedagogy is discussed in terms of discrete classical, philological, and critical phases that include such disparate approaches as classicism, impressionism, philology, evangelism, New Criticism, reader response, and the host of other conceptual frameworks presently known as "theory." The historical analysis clearly demonstrates a proclivity for teacher-centered instruction, preoccupation with text selection, and a tendency to blame student ignorance for failed pedagogy. Although there have been numerous advances in textual formatting, selection, and pairing, a model of literary knowledge based upon interpretive, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge provides a far more viable model of curricular content than merely sets of literary texts. The "knowledge model," in turn, makes possible the articulation of specific and measurable cognitive objectives for literature pedagogy as well as affective objectives with links to MI (multiple intelligences) theory and emotional intelligence. Since theory versus practice represents a false dichotomy, the latter is considered an outgrowth of the former. Teacher-centered literature teaching methods based on direct instruction are explained in terms of behaviorism and reflect perennialist and essentialist philosophies of education: learner-centered literature strategies such as discussion and cooperative learning, on the other hand, are firmly rooted in constructivism and reflect existential and progressive educational philosophies. I argue that the former has analogues in formalism, and the latter in reader response. Traditional assessments such as exams, journals, research papers, and presentations are transformed into portfolios, multigenre papers, and performance. The project concludes with a number of recommendations for further research and professional development.
590 $a School code: 0318.
650 4 $a Education, Language and Literature. $3 1018115
650 4 $a Literature, General. $3 1018152
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0401
710 2 $a Indiana University of Pennsylvania. $3 1019203
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-02A.
790 $a 0318
790 1 0 $a Cahalan, James M., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3303105