東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The impact of unexamined assumptions...

Anderson, James C.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The impact of unexamined assumptions and beliefs on organizational learning: A grounded theory investigation.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The impact of unexamined assumptions and beliefs on organizational learning: A grounded theory investigation./
作者:	Anderson, James C.
面頁冊數:	156 p.
附註:	Adviser: April Boyington Wall.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-11A.
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3290659
ISBN:	9780549340300

The impact of unexamined assumptions and beliefs on organizational learning: A grounded theory investigation.
Anderson, James C.

The impact of unexamined assumptions and beliefs on organizational learning: A grounded theory investigation. - 156 p.

Adviser: April Boyington Wall.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2008.

The exploration of unexamined assumptions and beliefs in an organization has theoretical and empirical value. The problem is that unexamined assumptions and beliefs limit performance improvement in organizations. This dissertation presents research on how unexamined assumptions and beliefs impact an organization's ability to learn. The literature on complexity theory, organizational learning, and symbolic interactionism is reviewed, evaluated, and synthesized to form the theoretical background of the research. There are six concepts of interest in this study that are considered in relation to each theory. These concepts are (a) unexamined assumptions and beliefs, (b) individual, (c) group, (d) organization, (e) internal reference, and (f) learning. The theoretical and conceptual similarities and differences in the three bodies of literature are discussed related to these concepts. The qualitative methodology of grounded theory connects to the topic, literature, and researcher in a discussion of its advantages and limitations. This choice of methodology results in the research design that is presented. The results of the research included the analysis process and answers to the research questions. Two assumptions or beliefs were identified in all levels of the organization in both groups and individuals. Theory was developed grounded in the discovery of those two assumptions or beliefs. The researcher considered implications of the theory related to the organization that was studied as well as future research opportunities.

ISBN: 9780549340300Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

The impact of unexamined assumptions and beliefs on organizational learning: A grounded theory investigation.
LDR:02563nam 2200301 a 45 001 956166
005 20110623
008 110624s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549340300
035 $a (UMI)AAI3290659
035 $a AAI3290659
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Anderson, James C. $3 1279612
245 1 4 $a The impact of unexamined assumptions and beliefs on organizational learning: A grounded theory investigation.
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Adviser: April Boyington Wall.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-11, Section: A, page: 4762.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2008.
520 $a The exploration of unexamined assumptions and beliefs in an organization has theoretical and empirical value. The problem is that unexamined assumptions and beliefs limit performance improvement in organizations. This dissertation presents research on how unexamined assumptions and beliefs impact an organization's ability to learn. The literature on complexity theory, organizational learning, and symbolic interactionism is reviewed, evaluated, and synthesized to form the theoretical background of the research. There are six concepts of interest in this study that are considered in relation to each theory. These concepts are (a) unexamined assumptions and beliefs, (b) individual, (c) group, (d) organization, (e) internal reference, and (f) learning. The theoretical and conceptual similarities and differences in the three bodies of literature are discussed related to these concepts. The qualitative methodology of grounded theory connects to the topic, literature, and researcher in a discussion of its advantages and limitations. This choice of methodology results in the research design that is presented. The results of the research included the analysis process and answers to the research questions. Two assumptions or beliefs were identified in all levels of the organization in both groups and individuals. Theory was developed grounded in the discovery of those two assumptions or beliefs. The researcher considered implications of the theory related to the organization that was studied as well as future research opportunities.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Business. $3 1018437
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-11A.
790 $a 1351
790 1 0 $a Boyington Wall, April, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Gull, Gregory $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Sherron, Todd $e committee member
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3290659