東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

When Happy Meals don't make children...

Hussar, Karen M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

When Happy Meals don't make children happy: Understanding children's judgments about meat-eating.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	When Happy Meals don't make children happy: Understanding children's judgments about meat-eating./
作者:	Hussar, Karen M.
面頁冊數:	84 p.
附註:	Adviser: Paul L. Harris.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-06A.
標題:	Education, Early Childhood. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3271684
ISBN:	9780549108689

When Happy Meals don't make children happy: Understanding children's judgments about meat-eating.
Hussar, Karen M.

When Happy Meals don't make children happy: Understanding children's judgments about meat-eating. - 84 p.

Adviser: Paul L. Harris.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Harvard University, 2007.

The current mixed-method study asks why non-vegetarian children and vegetarian children with either vegetarian or non-vegetarian parents abstain from eating meat as well as how these children judge individuals who do eat meat. A qualitative interview elicits responses from both vegetarian and non-vegetarian children with regard to a type of meat they do not eat together with their reasons for not doing so. A quantitative interview asks children to judge four individuals who eat meat: a morally committed vegetarian, a personally committed vegetarian, an uncommitted individual and the participating child him/herself. Results from the qualitative interview indicate that vegetarian children with non-vegetarian parents and vegetarian children with vegetarian parents are likely to cite moral reasons for not eating meat, whereas non-vegetarian children with meat-eating parents are likely to cite personal reasons for (occasionally) not eating meat. Many vegetarian children with vegetarian parents also reference their parents or religious leaders when justifying their vegetarian diet, suggesting that these children abstain from eating meat because an authority figure stipulates this behavior and not because they are concerned about animal suffering. Results from the quantitative interview indicate that children's judgments of meat-eating depend on two factors. First, they depend on whether or not an individual made a commitment to avoid eating meat. Second, they depend on whether this commitment was made for moral or personal reason.

ISBN: 9780549108689Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017530
Education, Early Childhood.

When Happy Meals don't make children happy: Understanding children's judgments about meat-eating.
LDR:02467nam 2200289 a 45 001 956143
005 20110623
008 110624s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549108689
035 $a (UMI)AAI3271684
035 $a AAI3271684
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Hussar, Karen M. $3 1279588
245 1 0 $a When Happy Meals don't make children happy: Understanding children's judgments about meat-eating.
300 $a 84 p.
500 $a Adviser: Paul L. Harris.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-06, Section: A, page: 2310.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Harvard University, 2007.
520 $a The current mixed-method study asks why non-vegetarian children and vegetarian children with either vegetarian or non-vegetarian parents abstain from eating meat as well as how these children judge individuals who do eat meat. A qualitative interview elicits responses from both vegetarian and non-vegetarian children with regard to a type of meat they do not eat together with their reasons for not doing so. A quantitative interview asks children to judge four individuals who eat meat: a morally committed vegetarian, a personally committed vegetarian, an uncommitted individual and the participating child him/herself. Results from the qualitative interview indicate that vegetarian children with non-vegetarian parents and vegetarian children with vegetarian parents are likely to cite moral reasons for not eating meat, whereas non-vegetarian children with meat-eating parents are likely to cite personal reasons for (occasionally) not eating meat. Many vegetarian children with vegetarian parents also reference their parents or religious leaders when justifying their vegetarian diet, suggesting that these children abstain from eating meat because an authority figure stipulates this behavior and not because they are concerned about animal suffering. Results from the quantitative interview indicate that children's judgments of meat-eating depend on two factors. First, they depend on whether or not an individual made a commitment to avoid eating meat. Second, they depend on whether this commitment was made for moral or personal reason.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Education, Early Childhood. $3 1017530
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Nutrition. $3 1017801
650 4 $a Psychology, Developmental. $3 1017557
690 $a 0518
690 $a 0570
690 $a 0620
710 2 $a Harvard University. $3 528741
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-06A.
790 $a 0084
790 1 0 $a Harris, Paul L., $e advisor
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3271684