東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Grammatical differences between trut...

Schafer, John R.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Grammatical differences between truthful and deceptive written narratives.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Grammatical differences between truthful and deceptive written narratives./
Author:	Schafer, John R.
Description:	107 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Patricia M. Hodges.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-01B.
Subject:	Language, Rhetoric and Composition. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3296068
ISBN:	9780549409397

Grammatical differences between truthful and deceptive written narratives.
Schafer, John R.

Grammatical differences between truthful and deceptive written narratives. - 107 p.

Adviser: Patricia M. Hodges.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2007.

This study examined the predictive value of grammar structures to differentiate truthful written narratives from deceptive written narratives. Native English speakers watched a digital presentation of a person shoplifting an item from a convenience store and wrote truthful and deceptive narratives regarding the shoplifting event. The three criteria examined were total words, text bridge ratio, and spontaneous negation ratio. The results of the study showed that the combination of the three variables total words, text bridge ratio, and spontaneous negation ratio correctly predicted deceptive written narratives 67% of the time and truthful written narratives 89% of the time. The results of the cross-validation study showed that the three variables total words, text bridge ratio, and spontaneous negation ratio predicted deceptive narratives 76% of the time and truthful narratives 85% of the time.

ISBN: 9780549409397Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019205
Language, Rhetoric and Composition.

Grammatical differences between truthful and deceptive written narratives.
LDR:01817nam 2200289 a 45 001 950179
005 20110525
008 110525s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549409397
035 $a (UMI)AAI3296068
035 $a AAI3296068
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Schafer, John R. $3 1273575
245 1 0 $a Grammatical differences between truthful and deceptive written narratives.
300 $a 107 p.
500 $a Adviser: Patricia M. Hodges.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-01, Section: B, page: 0657.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2007.
520 $a This study examined the predictive value of grammar structures to differentiate truthful written narratives from deceptive written narratives. Native English speakers watched a digital presentation of a person shoplifting an item from a convenience store and wrote truthful and deceptive narratives regarding the shoplifting event. The three criteria examined were total words, text bridge ratio, and spontaneous negation ratio. The results of the study showed that the combination of the three variables total words, text bridge ratio, and spontaneous negation ratio correctly predicted deceptive written narratives 67% of the time and truthful written narratives 89% of the time. The results of the cross-validation study showed that the three variables total words, text bridge ratio, and spontaneous negation ratio predicted deceptive narratives 76% of the time and truthful narratives 85% of the time.
590 $a School code: 1503.
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 1019205
650 4 $a Mass Communications. $3 1017395
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0708
710 2 $a Fielding Graduate University. $3 1020525
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-01B.
790 $a 1503
790 1 0 $a Hodges, Patricia M., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3296068