東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A comparison of emotional intelligen...

Freeland, Elizabeth Maria.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comparison of emotional intelligence and personality factors: Two concepts or one?

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comparison of emotional intelligence and personality factors: Two concepts or one?/
作者:	Freeland, Elizabeth Maria.
面頁冊數:	109 p.
附註:	Advisers: Robert A. Terry; Joseph L. Rodgers.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-03B.
標題:	Psychology, Cognitive. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3257385

A comparison of emotional intelligence and personality factors: Two concepts or one?
Freeland, Elizabeth Maria.

A comparison of emotional intelligence and personality factors: Two concepts or one? - 109 p.

Advisers: Robert A. Terry; Joseph L. Rodgers.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Oklahoma, 2007.

Emotional intelligence (EI) has become an active topic among researchers (e.g., Ciarrochi, Chan, Caputi & Roberts, 2001). Such attention has increased awareness of EI but also fueled controversy. Much of the conflict has focused on the multiple definitions of EI. This dilemma introduces issues of convergent validity and questions about discriminant validity between EI and similar constructs such as personality. The purpose of this study was to explore some of these controversial issues. Data were obtained over two semesters, primarily from undergraduate students taking a testing course at the University of Oklahoma, with additional subjects collected from University of Oklahoma graduate students in Europe. These students provided responses on three instruments: the MSCEIT, EQ-i, and 16PF. Eighty-nine students participated, from whom a small amount of demographic information was also obtained. Discriminant validity between EI and personality factors was examined by comparing results from the two EI questionnaires with the personality inventory. Convergent validity of the two EI measures was also assessed, and gender differences were explored. Finally, the predictability of EI based on personality was examined. The MSCEIT was found to measure components of EI separate from personality, whereas the EQ-i was determined to measure EI competencies that are related to and influenced by personality. The MSCEIT and EQ-i were also found to measure entirely different concepts from each other, and no gender differences were detected. Finally, certain personality factors were suggested as having a predictive relationship with EI competency. Implications of these findings, difficulty with questionnaire accessibility and scoring, and suggestions for future research are discussed.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017810
Psychology, Cognitive.

A comparison of emotional intelligence and personality factors: Two concepts or one?
LDR:02743nam 2200289 a 45 001 946480
005 20110523
008 110523s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI3257385
035 $a AAI3257385
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Freeland, Elizabeth Maria. $3 1269890
245 1 2 $a A comparison of emotional intelligence and personality factors: Two concepts or one?
300 $a 109 p.
500 $a Advisers: Robert A. Terry; Joseph L. Rodgers.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-03, Section: B, page: 1973.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Oklahoma, 2007.
520 $a Emotional intelligence (EI) has become an active topic among researchers (e.g., Ciarrochi, Chan, Caputi & Roberts, 2001). Such attention has increased awareness of EI but also fueled controversy. Much of the conflict has focused on the multiple definitions of EI. This dilemma introduces issues of convergent validity and questions about discriminant validity between EI and similar constructs such as personality. The purpose of this study was to explore some of these controversial issues. Data were obtained over two semesters, primarily from undergraduate students taking a testing course at the University of Oklahoma, with additional subjects collected from University of Oklahoma graduate students in Europe. These students provided responses on three instruments: the MSCEIT, EQ-i, and 16PF. Eighty-nine students participated, from whom a small amount of demographic information was also obtained. Discriminant validity between EI and personality factors was examined by comparing results from the two EI questionnaires with the personality inventory. Convergent validity of the two EI measures was also assessed, and gender differences were explored. Finally, the predictability of EI based on personality was examined. The MSCEIT was found to measure components of EI separate from personality, whereas the EQ-i was determined to measure EI competencies that are related to and influenced by personality. The MSCEIT and EQ-i were also found to measure entirely different concepts from each other, and no gender differences were detected. Finally, certain personality factors were suggested as having a predictive relationship with EI competency. Implications of these findings, difficulty with questionnaire accessibility and scoring, and suggestions for future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0169.
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0632
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a The University of Oklahoma. $3 1021915
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-03B.
790 $a 0169
790 1 0 $a Rodgers, Joseph L., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Terry, Robert A., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3257385