東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Collaborating and competing? Uncoup...

Aime, Federico.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Collaborating and competing? Uncoupling value creation and value appropriation in strategic alliances.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Collaborating and competing? Uncoupling value creation and value appropriation in strategic alliances./
作者:	Aime, Federico.
面頁冊數:	86 p.
附註:	Adviser: Robert Wiseman.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-05A.
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3264128
ISBN:	9780549026983

Collaborating and competing? Uncoupling value creation and value appropriation in strategic alliances.
Aime, Federico.

Collaborating and competing? Uncoupling value creation and value appropriation in strategic alliances. - 86 p.

Adviser: Robert Wiseman.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2007.

Similarly, I study how a firms partners' resources may predict value creation but differential resource endowments between partners may result in dissimilar value appropriation potential by individual partners.

ISBN: 9780549026983Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

Collaborating and competing? Uncoupling value creation and value appropriation in strategic alliances.
LDR:03447nam 2200301 a 45 001 946040
005 20110523
008 110523s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549026983
035 $a (UMI)AAI3264128
035 $a AAI3264128
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Aime, Federico. $3 1269449
245 1 0 $a Collaborating and competing? Uncoupling value creation and value appropriation in strategic alliances.
300 $a 86 p.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Wiseman.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-05, Section: A, page: 2038.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2007.
520 $a Similarly, I study how a firms partners' resources may predict value creation but differential resource endowments between partners may result in dissimilar value appropriation potential by individual partners.
520 $a A broadly supported general finding from collaboration research is that organizations involved in inter-firm collaboration usually achieve above average performance and survival, although with substantial variation in outcomes (Burt, 1983; Hagedoorn & Schakeraad, 1994; Mitchel & Singh, 1996; Owen-Smith & Powell, 2003; Singh & Mitchell, 2005; Stuart & Podolny, 1999; Uzzi, 1997). Explanations for those large variations in outcomes (e.g., structural and capability based approaches) offer conflicting predictions and findings as to their effect on alliance performance (Ahuja, 2000; Bae & Gargiulo, 2004; Burt, 1992; Chung, Singh, & Lee, 2000; Coleman, 1988, 1990; Gulati & Singh, 1998; Hargadon & Sutton, 1997; Stuart, 2000; Walker, Kogut & Shan, 1997). I identify two distinct theoretical dimensions of strategic alliances: collaboration (i.e., value creation) and competition (i.e., value appropriation) (Burt, 1991; Hamel, Doz, & Prahalad, 1989; Inkpen, 2001; Lax & Sebenius, 1986; Teece, 1986). In the literature these dimensions are combined in the construct of performance and yet often have opposite effects on an organization's ability to derive value from an alliance. By formulating and testing models for these two dimensions of performance I provide an explanation to resolve the conflicting guidance of both the structural and the capability based approaches about alliances effect on performance. For example, I theoretically develop and test the idea that network closure may result in value creation within alliances while structural holes may facilitate value appropriation by individual partners.
520 $a I test these models on a large longitudinal sample of strategic alliances with sequential cross-nested multilevel techniques. This analytical approach addresses methodological difficulties implicit in the study of networks data (e.g., dependencies among observations, cross-level interactions) that are not addressed in previous strategic alliances research and is capable of dealing with the interdependencies between firms in the sample. My reformulation of theory and methods to study alliance performance contributes to realizing the potential of resource based and structural approaches as powerful explanations and sources of guidance for firms' strategic alliance choices.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $3 676168
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-05A.
790 $a 0128
790 1 0 $a Wiseman, Robert, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3264128