東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

School finance and the parcel tax al...

Ellsworth, Julia A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

School finance and the parcel tax alternative: Creating inequities in per-pupil spending.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	School finance and the parcel tax alternative: Creating inequities in per-pupil spending./
作者:	Ellsworth, Julia A.
面頁冊數:	199 p.
附註:	Adviser: Gail Hughes.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-09A.
標題:	Education, Finance. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3278014
ISBN:	9780549219255

School finance and the parcel tax alternative: Creating inequities in per-pupil spending.
Ellsworth, Julia A.

School finance and the parcel tax alternative: Creating inequities in per-pupil spending. - 199 p.

Adviser: Gail Hughes.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2007.

The objective of this research was to investigate the equity of education delivery mechanisms when school districts use flexible, unspecified parcel tax proceeds to increase teacher salaries, expand program availability, upgrade instructional materials and modernize school technology. This mixed methodology research was conducted in two phases. The quantitative, statistical analysis explored 13 independent characteristics of 49 parcel and 49 non-parcel tax school districts to isolate features or similarities that these districts may or may not share. An examination of the acquired data revealed that school districts in higher income communities, regardless of their parcel tax status, have better access to education resources and services. Even with substantial differences in per-pupil spending in districts that employ parcel taxes compared to non-parcel tax school districts, student test scores and graduation rates do not illuminate a specific inequity in the educational delivery mechanism. The second phase of this study sought to validate the statistical conclusions through semi-structured interviews with local education agency administrators, school board members, and foundation executives. An analysis of Phase II outcomes revealed that despite the State's attempt to equalize per-pupil spending, education delivery mechanisms are heavily influenced by the community, teachers, administrators and parents. More affluent communities respond to inadequate school funding by attracting sponsors, creating foundations, promoting parcel tax measures, and soliciting pro bono services. These districts continue to fund their local school districts in a manner that meets or exceeds their expectations, regardless of the financial burden. Unfortunately, in the State of California, demographics and socioeconomic levels dictate the scope and depth of educational opportunities.

ISBN: 9780549219255Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020300
Education, Finance.

School finance and the parcel tax alternative: Creating inequities in per-pupil spending.
LDR:02844nam 2200289 a 45 001 940562
005 20110518
008 110518s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549219255
035 $a (UMI)AAI3278014
035 $a AAI3278014
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Ellsworth, Julia A. $3 1264692
245 1 0 $a School finance and the parcel tax alternative: Creating inequities in per-pupil spending.
300 $a 199 p.
500 $a Adviser: Gail Hughes.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-09, Section: A, page: 3740.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2007.
520 $a The objective of this research was to investigate the equity of education delivery mechanisms when school districts use flexible, unspecified parcel tax proceeds to increase teacher salaries, expand program availability, upgrade instructional materials and modernize school technology. This mixed methodology research was conducted in two phases. The quantitative, statistical analysis explored 13 independent characteristics of 49 parcel and 49 non-parcel tax school districts to isolate features or similarities that these districts may or may not share. An examination of the acquired data revealed that school districts in higher income communities, regardless of their parcel tax status, have better access to education resources and services. Even with substantial differences in per-pupil spending in districts that employ parcel taxes compared to non-parcel tax school districts, student test scores and graduation rates do not illuminate a specific inequity in the educational delivery mechanism. The second phase of this study sought to validate the statistical conclusions through semi-structured interviews with local education agency administrators, school board members, and foundation executives. An analysis of Phase II outcomes revealed that despite the State's attempt to equalize per-pupil spending, education delivery mechanisms are heavily influenced by the community, teachers, administrators and parents. More affluent communities respond to inadequate school funding by attracting sponsors, creating foundations, promoting parcel tax measures, and soliciting pro bono services. These districts continue to fund their local school districts in a manner that meets or exceeds their expectations, regardless of the financial burden. Unfortunately, in the State of California, demographics and socioeconomic levels dictate the scope and depth of educational opportunities.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
690 $a 0277
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Education. $3 1018430
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-09A.
790 $a 1351
790 1 0 $a Gregori, Nancy $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Hughes, Gail, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Ray, Ted $e committee member
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3278014