東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Gender differences in moral reasonin...

Estes, Martha Israel.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Gender differences in moral reasoning comparing pre-professional university students in nursing, education, and engineering: A content analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Gender differences in moral reasoning comparing pre-professional university students in nursing, education, and engineering: A content analysis./
作者:	Estes, Martha Israel.
面頁冊數:	193 p.
附註:	Chairperson: Patricia A. Bauch.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International55-07A.
標題:	Education, Educational Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://140.128.148.244/ctccon1/9429222.pdf

Gender differences in moral reasoning comparing pre-professional university students in nursing, education, and engineering: A content analysis.
Estes, Martha Israel.

Gender differences in moral reasoning comparing pre-professional university students in nursing, education, and engineering: A content analysis. - 193 p.

Chairperson: Patricia A. Bauch.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The University of Alabama, 1994.

The purpose of this study was to explicate moral reasoning theory and the ways pre-professional university students resolve ethical dilemmas. Early philosophers connected moral reasoning with caring and situational factors; however, Kohlberg, who is considered the leading researcher in moral reasoning, moved toward a justice ethic. Gilligan argues that while Kohlberg's work deserves merit, relational aspects need to be included in his theory of moral reasoning.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017560
Education, Educational Psychology.

Gender differences in moral reasoning comparing pre-professional university students in nursing, education, and engineering: A content analysis.
LDR:03492nam 2200349 a 45 001 939704
005 20110517
008 110517s1994 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI9429222
035 $a AAI9429222
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Estes, Martha Israel. $3 1263811
245 1 0 $a Gender differences in moral reasoning comparing pre-professional university students in nursing, education, and engineering: A content analysis.
300 $a 193 p.
500 $a Chairperson: Patricia A. Bauch.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-07, Section: A, page: 1866.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The University of Alabama, 1994.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to explicate moral reasoning theory and the ways pre-professional university students resolve ethical dilemmas. Early philosophers connected moral reasoning with caring and situational factors; however, Kohlberg, who is considered the leading researcher in moral reasoning, moved toward a justice ethic. Gilligan argues that while Kohlberg's work deserves merit, relational aspects need to be included in his theory of moral reasoning.
520 $a A review of the literature revealed a sharp debate, with Kohlberg's followers maintaining the completeness of his theory and Gilligan's supporters arguing that moral reasoning theory should include the relational aspects she found in females. Gilligan claims that since Kohlberg only studied males, his research did not document the relational component common to females. This research sought to expand knowledge about moral reasoning theory, linking Watson's Caring Theory for nursing with research on moral reasoning.
520 $a The present study involved interviews with 28 males and 28 females in pre-professional programs of nursing, education, and engineering. The research used content analysis and the Manual for Coding Real-Life Dilemmas (Lyons, 1982) to analyze subjects' hypothetical and real life dilemma solutions.
520 $a The study was designed to see if males and females resolve moral dilemmas in differing fashions, and differences in individuals entering caring professions compared to those entering engineering. From this study, the researcher developed a theoretical framework explaining moral reasoning functioning based on both justice and care orientations.
520 $a Chi Square analysis revealed several significant differences. For the hypothetical dilemma, females used more "justice" orientations and males used more "combined" but fewer "care" orientations than expected. For the real life dilemma, males used more "combined" orientations than expected. Participants had more caring orientations for the real life dilemma than the hypothetical dilemma. There were no significant differences for individuals in the three pre-professional majors.
520 $a The interviews revealed moral reasoning built on justice and care orientations, with individuals voicing conflict over rules versus relational factors. This study indicates support for combining care and justice in moral reasoning theory. The researcher suggests using diverse methods of study, further investigating Kohlberg's and Gilligan's precepts.
590 $a School code: 0004.
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Philosophy of. $3 783746
650 4 $a Education, Sociology of. $3 626654
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0998
710 2 $a The University of Alabama. $3 1019361
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 55-07A.
790 $a 0004
790 1 0 $a Bauch, Patricia A., $e advisor
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 1994
856 4 0 $u http://140.128.148.244/ctccon1/9429222.pdf