東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The effect of computer-based music e...

Pan, Kok Chang.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The effect of computer-based music education software with MIDI versus virtual keyboard use on student achievement and opinion.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The effect of computer-based music education software with MIDI versus virtual keyboard use on student achievement and opinion./
作者:	Pan, Kok Chang.
面頁冊數:	158 p.
附註:	Chairperson: Harry E. Price.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-09A.
標題:	Education, Music. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3027369
ISBN:	0493392386

The effect of computer-based music education software with MIDI versus virtual keyboard use on student achievement and opinion.
Pan, Kok Chang.

The effect of computer-based music education software with MIDI versus virtual keyboard use on student achievement and opinion. - 158 p.

Chairperson: Harry E. Price.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The University of Alabama, 2001.

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two different data input devices (mouse versus MIDI keyboard) with a music education computer assisted instructional (CAI) program on the achievement of nonmusic majors enrolled in a college level music fundamentals class. The study also sought to ascertain the attitudes and reactions of the students toward the use of the CAI program (i.e., <italic>Music Ace 1</italic>™).

ISBN: 0493392386Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017808
Education, Music.

The effect of computer-based music education software with MIDI versus virtual keyboard use on student achievement and opinion.
LDR:03217nam 2200337 a 45 001 937487
005 20110511
008 110511s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493392386
035 $a (UnM)AAI3027369
035 $a AAI3027369
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Pan, Kok Chang. $3 1261349
245 1 0 $a The effect of computer-based music education software with MIDI versus virtual keyboard use on student achievement and opinion.
300 $a 158 p.
500 $a Chairperson: Harry E. Price.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-09, Section: A, page: 2998.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The University of Alabama, 2001.
520 $a The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two different data input devices (mouse versus MIDI keyboard) with a music education computer assisted instructional (CAI) program on the achievement of nonmusic majors enrolled in a college level music fundamentals class. The study also sought to ascertain the attitudes and reactions of the students toward the use of the CAI program (i.e., <italic>Music Ace 1</italic>™).
520 $a Two groups of students (MIDI versus Virtual) completed 16 sessions from <italic> Music Ace</italic> for one semester. The MIDI group used a MIDI keyboard while the Virtual group used a virtual keyboard with a computer mouse. Dependent variables were time spent and game scores for each <italic>Music Ace</italic> session, and researcher designed keyboard and written tests.
520 $a Participants were assigned to the MIDI (n = 25) or Virtual group (n = 26), based on their class sections. A written survey and pretest were administered at the beginning of the semester. Students were evaluated weekly by the CAI program, and by means of two keyboard tests and written posttests throughout the semester. All students received the same materials and lectures.
520 $a Results yielded no significant differences in time or game scores between groups in all but one session of <italic>Music Ace.</italic> There were also no significant differences between groups on the keyboard or written posttests. The results, however, did demonstrate a significant improvement in student achievement between pre- and posttests. Although not significant, the Virtual group was consistently faster and more accurate on most of the tests. The MIDI group rated the <italic>Music Ace</italic> games as being significantly more difficult in two of the 16 sessions.
520 $a This study suggests that using the MIDI keyboard with <italic>Music Ace </italic> provides no advantage in terms of students' achievement. Additionally, the CAI software seemed to have a significant positive impact on students' achievement as demonstrated by the written posttest results. However, students did not generally view the CAI program very positively because of the fast pace and difficulty level of the games.
590 $a School code: 0004.
650 4 $a Education, Music. $3 1017808
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
650 4 $a Music. $3 516178
690 $a 0413
690 $a 0522
690 $a 0710
710 2 0 $a The University of Alabama. $3 1019361
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-09A.
790 $a 0004
790 1 0 $a Price, Harry E., $e advisor
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3027369