東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Self-fulfilling prophecies: Dogmati...

Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Self-fulfilling prophecies: Dogmatic secularism and political Islam in international conflict.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Self-fulfilling prophecies: Dogmatic secularism and political Islam in international conflict./
Author:	Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman.
Description:	247 p.
Notes:	Advisers: Siba N. Grovogui; William E. Connolly.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-03A.
Subject:	Anthropology, Cultural. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3046476
ISBN:	0493606661

Self-fulfilling prophecies: Dogmatic secularism and political Islam in international conflict.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman.

Self-fulfilling prophecies: Dogmatic secularism and political Islam in international conflict. - 247 p.

Advisers: Siba N. Grovogui; William E. Connolly.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Johns Hopkins University, 2002.

The opposition between dogmatic secular and radical political Islamic traditions, and the possibility that this opposition might be transcended, form the subject matter of this dissertation. The study sits at the intersection of two swathes of Euro-Islamic cultural history: relations between the West and the Islamic world, and discourses on religion and politics.

ISBN: 0493606661Subjects--Topical Terms:

735016
Anthropology, Cultural.

Self-fulfilling prophecies: Dogmatic secularism and political Islam in international conflict.
LDR:03393nam 2200325 a 45 001 937091
005 20110511
008 110511s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493606661
035 $a (UnM)AAI3046476
035 $a AAI3046476
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. $3 1260958
245 1 0 $a Self-fulfilling prophecies: Dogmatic secularism and political Islam in international conflict.
300 $a 247 p.
500 $a Advisers: Siba N. Grovogui; William E. Connolly.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A, page: 1122.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Johns Hopkins University, 2002.
520 $a The opposition between dogmatic secular and radical political Islamic traditions, and the possibility that this opposition might be transcended, form the subject matter of this dissertation. The study sits at the intersection of two swathes of Euro-Islamic cultural history: relations between the West and the Islamic world, and discourses on religion and politics.
520 $a It is commonly assumed that religion and politics have been separate under secularism and united under political Islam. This assumption fuels antagonism between the two communities associated with these traditions. Each perceives the other as threatening its way of life, public/private divide, and concept of religious freedom. Drawing on the paradox of identity/difference as articulated by William Connolly and others, I argue that each tradition actually creates its own theopolitical identity through opposition to its counterpart. This situation renders both modes of authority blind to their shared presupposition that the relation between religion and politics must assume a singular and static form under central legislation and administration. This presupposition, in turn, stifles processes of political pluralization by delegitimizing alternative modes of governance.
520 $a Through a series of historical and philosophical arguments, this study presents these traditions' common debts and outlines the contingencies against which they stake their clashing claims to political hegemony and moral superiority. Examinations of both historical and contemporary politics of Iran, Turkey and the United States lend context and content to the argument. I challenge the assumption that religion and politics have been separate in the secular West and united in the Islamic Middle East, and delve into the origins of their shared belief in the need for centralized legislation authorizing a single and authoritative public relation between religion and politics. I argue that it is necessary to reconsider all attempts—both Western and Islamic in origin—to commandeer universal theological, moral and political settlements. Finally, I sketch the outlines of a nonhegemonic and nondogmatic approach to religion and global politics. This ‘postsecular’ alternative transcends militant versions of secularism and political Islam and the ethical constraints that often accompany them.
590 $a School code: 0098.
650 4 $a Anthropology, Cultural. $3 735016
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
650 4 $a Religion, History of. $3 1017471
690 $a 0320
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0616
710 2 0 $a The Johns Hopkins University. $3 1017431
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-03A.
790 $a 0098
790 1 0 $a Connolly, William E., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Grovogui, Siba N., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3046476