東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effects of computer-assisted instruc...

Bingham, Millard Juette.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of computer-assisted instruction versus traditional instruction on adult GED student TABE scores.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effects of computer-assisted instruction versus traditional instruction on adult GED student TABE scores./
作者:	Bingham, Millard Juette.
面頁冊數:	115 p.
附註:	Adviser: John R. Rachal.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-04A
標題:	Education, Adult and Continuing -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3049561
ISBN:	0493640290

Effects of computer-assisted instruction versus traditional instruction on adult GED student TABE scores.
Bingham, Millard Juette.

Effects of computer-assisted instruction versus traditional instruction on adult GED student TABE scores. - 115 p.

Adviser: John R. Rachal.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Southern Mississippi, 2002.

This study examined the efficacy of using computer-assisted instruction (CAI) with adult students participating in the adult education/General Educational Development (GED) preparation programs provided by the Hattiesburg Public School District. Students in the program were assigned to either an experimental group that received CAI instruction or to a control group that received traditional instruction (TI). During a semester period each group received 20 hours of instruction. Pretest scores on the <italic>Tests of Adult Basic Education </italic> (<italic>TABE</italic>) served as covariates in determining differences in the two groups on the <italic>TABE</italic> posttests. No statistically significant differences were found between mean scores of the experimental and the control groups. Both methods were found to be equally effective with an adult GED student population. The researcher concluded that CAI can be of utility to adult educators, but is clearly no panacea when it comes to preparing students for the GED Tests. If program administrators are looking for a magical method of instruction that will surpass results from traditional teacher-provided instruction, they must continue to look beyond CAI for other innovative methods. CAI did however offer other benefits such as aiding with student retention and freeing up instructor time

ISBN: 0493640290Subjects--Topical Terms:

1260395
Education, Adult and Continuing

Effects of computer-assisted instruction versus traditional instruction on adult GED student TABE scores.
LDR:02897nam 2200313 a 45 001 936633
005 20110510
008 110510s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493640290
035 $a (UnM)AAI3049561
035 $a AAI3049561
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Bingham, Millard Juette. $3 1260393
245 1 0 $a Effects of computer-assisted instruction versus traditional instruction on adult GED student TABE scores.
300 $a 115 p.
500 $a Adviser: John R. Rachal.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: A, page: 1222.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Southern Mississippi, 2002.
520 $a This study examined the efficacy of using computer-assisted instruction (CAI) with adult students participating in the adult education/General Educational Development (GED) preparation programs provided by the Hattiesburg Public School District. Students in the program were assigned to either an experimental group that received CAI instruction or to a control group that received traditional instruction (TI). During a semester period each group received 20 hours of instruction. Pretest scores on the <italic>Tests of Adult Basic Education </italic> (<italic>TABE</italic>) served as covariates in determining differences in the two groups on the <italic>TABE</italic> posttests. No statistically significant differences were found between mean scores of the experimental and the control groups. Both methods were found to be equally effective with an adult GED student population. The researcher concluded that CAI can be of utility to adult educators, but is clearly no panacea when it comes to preparing students for the GED Tests. If program administrators are looking for a magical method of instruction that will surpass results from traditional teacher-provided instruction, they must continue to look beyond CAI for other innovative methods. CAI did however offer other benefits such as aiding with student retention and freeing up instructor time
520 $a The researcher concluded that CAI is of value when used to complement traditional instruction in the GED classroom. CAI bestows added confidence upon the adult learner and also aids the student in developing a degree of technological literacy, a skill that is of paramount importance in today's technologically driven world. CAI should not be viewed as a one-way ticket to successful learning outcomes in the GED preparation classroom, but it can be part of the journey. CAI was not found to be any more effective than the traditional educational program it complements
590 $a School code: 0211
650 $a Education, Adult and Continuing $3 1260395
650 $a Education, Curriculum and Instruction $3 1260268
650 $a Education, Technology $3 1260262
650 $a Education, Tests and Measurements $3 1260321
690 $a 028
690 $a 051
690 $a 071
690 $a 072
710 2 $a The University of Southern Mississippi $3 1260394
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-04A
790 $a 021
790 1 $a Rachal, John R., $e adviso
791 $a Ph.D
792 $a 200
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3049561