東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Organizing the firm: Corporate gove...

Jackson, Gregory Scott.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Organizing the firm: Corporate governance in Germany and Japan, 1870--2000.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Organizing the firm: Corporate governance in Germany and Japan, 1870--2000./
作者:	Jackson, Gregory Scott.
面頁冊數:	439 p.
附註:	Adviser: David Stark.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-04A
標題:	Business Administration, Management -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3048154
ISBN:	0493624716

Organizing the firm: Corporate governance in Germany and Japan, 1870--2000.
Jackson, Gregory Scott.

Organizing the firm: Corporate governance in Germany and Japan, 1870--2000. - 439 p.

Adviser: David Stark.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2002.

This study offers a historical comparison of corporate governance in Germany and Japan. Both countries have broadly similar nonliberal types of corporate governance. In contrast to liberal cases such as the United States, their post-war models were characterized by the limited marketization and parallel integration of capital and labor within the corporation. Yet their historical origins and underlying institutional differences have remained neglected. A sociological framework is developed for comparing the national diversity of corporate governance. National cases are conceived in terms of organizational practices, their institutional settings and national politics. The study traces the institutional factors historically shaping the “demarketization” of capital and labor, as well as the unintended fit resulting between them within the firm. In contrast to explanations rooted in economic efficiency or culture, national diversity is by the political dynamics of corporate governance. Germany and Japan developed similar political approaches as their state-society relations underwent parallel sequence of development through 19<super>th</super> Century conservative social reform, its failure and post-war democracy. This historical sequence is shown to have influenced the two critical junctures for nonliberal corporate governance: the transition from family to intercorporate ownership and the democratization of paternalistic labor management that established industrial citizenship within the corporation. The study also examines the consequences of internationalization for national diversity during the 1990s. While most observers see internationalization as leading to convergence on a liberal shareholder-oriented model, this study presents a more differentiated view of how Germany and Japan's national models adapt through a novel process of hybridization. The viability of the emerging hybrid depends on reconciling a greater market-orientation for capital and a modified version of industrial citizenship in a new model of enlightened shareholder value

ISBN: 0493624716Subjects--Topical Terms:

1260387
Business Administration, Management

Organizing the firm: Corporate governance in Germany and Japan, 1870--2000.
LDR:02969nam 2200289 a 45 001 936630
005 20110510
008 110510s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493624716
035 $a (UnM)AAI3048154
035 $a AAI3048154
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Jackson, Gregory Scott. $3 1260386
245 1 0 $a Organizing the firm: Corporate governance in Germany and Japan, 1870--2000.
300 $a 439 p.
500 $a Adviser: David Stark.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: A, page: 1563.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2002.
520 $a This study offers a historical comparison of corporate governance in Germany and Japan. Both countries have broadly similar nonliberal types of corporate governance. In contrast to liberal cases such as the United States, their post-war models were characterized by the limited marketization and parallel integration of capital and labor within the corporation. Yet their historical origins and underlying institutional differences have remained neglected. A sociological framework is developed for comparing the national diversity of corporate governance. National cases are conceived in terms of organizational practices, their institutional settings and national politics. The study traces the institutional factors historically shaping the “demarketization” of capital and labor, as well as the unintended fit resulting between them within the firm. In contrast to explanations rooted in economic efficiency or culture, national diversity is by the political dynamics of corporate governance. Germany and Japan developed similar political approaches as their state-society relations underwent parallel sequence of development through 19<super>th</super> Century conservative social reform, its failure and post-war democracy. This historical sequence is shown to have influenced the two critical junctures for nonliberal corporate governance: the transition from family to intercorporate ownership and the democratization of paternalistic labor management that established industrial citizenship within the corporation. The study also examines the consequences of internationalization for national diversity during the 1990s. While most observers see internationalization as leading to convergence on a liberal shareholder-oriented model, this study presents a more differentiated view of how Germany and Japan's national models adapt through a novel process of hybridization. The viability of the emerging hybrid depends on reconciling a greater market-orientation for capital and a modified version of industrial citizenship in a new model of enlightened shareholder value
590 $a School code: 0054
650 $a Business Administration, Management $3 1260387
650 $a Political Science, General $3 1260388
650 $a Sociology, General $3 1260389
690 $a 045
690 $a 061
690 $a 062
710 2 $a Columbia University $3 1260295
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-04A
790 $a 005
790 1 $a Stark, David, $e adviso
791 $a Ph.D
792 $a 200
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3048154