東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Wu-wei and the question of the other.

Hao, Changchi.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Wu-wei and the question of the other.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Wu-wei and the question of the other./
作者:	Hao, Changchi.
面頁冊數:	267 p.
附註:	Director: Merold Westphal.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-12A
標題:	Philosophy -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3037218
ISBN:	0493502297

Wu-wei and the question of the other.
Hao, Changchi.

Wu-wei and the question of the other. - 267 p.

Director: Merold Westphal.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fordham University, 2002.

My conclusion is that if the subject in “Who comes after the subject?” is a knowing subject, then in postmodern ethics, the subjectivity of the subject is constituted in its ethical responsibilities

ISBN: 0493502297Subjects--Topical Terms:

550317
Philosophy

Wu-wei and the question of the other.
LDR:03040nam 2200289 a 45 001 936580
005 20110510
008 110510s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493502297
035 $a (UnM)AAI3037218
035 $a AAI3037218
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hao, Changchi. $3 1260288
245 1 0 $a Wu-wei and the question of the other.
300 $a 267 p.
500 $a Director: Merold Westphal.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-12, Section: A, page: 4196.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fordham University, 2002.
520 $a My conclusion is that if the subject in “Who comes after the subject?” is a knowing subject, then in postmodern ethics, the subjectivity of the subject is constituted in its ethical responsibilities
520 $a In the dissertation I have presented a historical, comparative, and systematic study on the issue of the relation between aesthetic subjects and ethical subjects by focusing on the philosophers Lao-zi, Zhuang-zi, Mencius, Tu Wei-ming, Heidegger, Derrida, Foucault, and Levinas. By “aesthetic” I mean “amoral” in the Kierkegaardian sense, and by “ethical” I mean care and compassion for others in the Levinasian (or Mo-zian) sense. The dissertation is correspondingly divided into two parts: “Part (I): Aesthetic Subjects,” and “Part (II): Ethical Subjects.” In Part I, I argue that in Lao-zi and Zhuang-zi there is a tranquil poetic-religious-aesthetic subject, in Heidegger a heroic-existential-aesthetic subject (Dasein) and a poetic-aesthetic subject (the essential thinker), and in Confucianism a metaphysical-moral-aesthetic subject. In Part II, one can see that in Derrida there is an ethical-religious subject, in Foucault, an ethical-political subject, and in Levinas, a pious religious-ethical subject.
520 $a By investigating, interpreting and comparing three kinds of ethics, metaphysical moral theory, originary ethics, and postmodern ethics, I try to provide an answer to the question asked by contemporary philosophers “Who comes after the subject?” The subject, as I understand it, means the subject of representation, the metaphysical subject. This subject is essentially aesthetic. The end of the (metaphysical) subject is my starting point. The central theme of my present study is that an ethical subject is possible only on the condition that it is first a situated subject. However, this does not mean that a situated subject is necessarily an ethical one. After the death of the subject there are at least two possibilities of being a situated subject, the aesthetic one and the ethical one: for example, the Nietzschean subject in early Derrida and the Levinasian subject in later Derrida respectively
590 $a School code: 0072
650 $a Philosophy $3 550317
690 $a 042
710 2 $a Fordham University $3 1260289
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-12A
790 $a 007
790 1 $a Westphal, Merold, $e adviso
791 $a Ph.D
792 $a 200
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3037218