東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Protecting marine birds from oil pol...

Fries, John Neal.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Protecting marine birds from oil pollution impacts in Japan: An examination of Japan's preparedness and response system for oil spill incidents through comparison with the United States model.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Protecting marine birds from oil pollution impacts in Japan: An examination of Japan's preparedness and response system for oil spill incidents through comparison with the United States model./
作者:	Fries, John Neal.
面頁冊數:	378 p.
附註:	Adviser: William Hamilton, III.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-05B.
標題:	Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3051526
ISBN:	0493662340

Protecting marine birds from oil pollution impacts in Japan: An examination of Japan's preparedness and response system for oil spill incidents through comparison with the United States model.
Fries, John Neal.

Protecting marine birds from oil pollution impacts in Japan: An examination of Japan's preparedness and response system for oil spill incidents through comparison with the United States model. - 378 p.

Adviser: William Hamilton, III.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2002.

In the Japanese oil spill response literature, there has been insufficient examination of wildlife protection actions, especially analysis relevant to smaller spills. This study analyzes the Japanese system for preparedness and response through comparison with the U.S. model, using legislation, contingency plans, available literature, interviews, and implementation. Lack of statutory mandates and the general nature of relevant provisions within contingency plans results in an overall lack of government accountability for wildlife protection during spills. Wildlife protection is not a national priority, and contingency plans have not incorporated priority ranking of sensitive wildlife and habitat. There are few opportunities for input by wildlife stakeholders during planning and implementation of the main response, and integration of wildlife operations is poor. Wildlife management personnel are often not notified of smaller spills. Most wildlife protection provisions target the Environment Agency, which generally plays only a coordinating role and relies on local governments for implementation of wildlife protection actions, for which local planning or implementation is not required. Accurate information on sensitive wildlife and habitat for use in planning, response, and restoration is scarce, as is expertise in mitigating wildlife impacts. Reliable funds for wildlife protection actions will often not exist, and such actions compete for limited domestic funds. Wildlife operations focus on oiled bird rehabilitation, which competes with more effective actions for funds and personnel. Hazing and wildlife reconnaissance have not been emphasized and damage assessment is primarily monitoring natural recovery, with no precedent for active post-spill restoration of seabird populations.

ISBN: 0493662340Subjects--Topical Terms:

783690
Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife.

Protecting marine birds from oil pollution impacts in Japan: An examination of Japan's preparedness and response system for oil spill incidents through comparison with the United States model.
LDR:02867nam 2200301 a 45 001 934674
005 20110509
008 110509s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493662340
035 $a (UnM)AAI3051526
035 $a AAI3051526
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Fries, John Neal. $3 1258374
245 1 0 $a Protecting marine birds from oil pollution impacts in Japan: An examination of Japan's preparedness and response system for oil spill incidents through comparison with the United States model.
300 $a 378 p.
500 $a Adviser: William Hamilton, III.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-05, Section: B, page: 2276.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2002.
520 $a In the Japanese oil spill response literature, there has been insufficient examination of wildlife protection actions, especially analysis relevant to smaller spills. This study analyzes the Japanese system for preparedness and response through comparison with the U.S. model, using legislation, contingency plans, available literature, interviews, and implementation. Lack of statutory mandates and the general nature of relevant provisions within contingency plans results in an overall lack of government accountability for wildlife protection during spills. Wildlife protection is not a national priority, and contingency plans have not incorporated priority ranking of sensitive wildlife and habitat. There are few opportunities for input by wildlife stakeholders during planning and implementation of the main response, and integration of wildlife operations is poor. Wildlife management personnel are often not notified of smaller spills. Most wildlife protection provisions target the Environment Agency, which generally plays only a coordinating role and relies on local governments for implementation of wildlife protection actions, for which local planning or implementation is not required. Accurate information on sensitive wildlife and habitat for use in planning, response, and restoration is scarce, as is expertise in mitigating wildlife impacts. Reliable funds for wildlife protection actions will often not exist, and such actions compete for limited domestic funds. Wildlife operations focus on oiled bird rehabilitation, which competes with more effective actions for funds and personnel. Hazing and wildlife reconnaissance have not been emphasized and damage assessment is primarily monitoring natural recovery, with no precedent for active post-spill restoration of seabird populations.
590 $a School code: 0029.
650 4 $a Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. $3 783690
650 4 $a Biology, Oceanography. $3 783691
650 4 $a Environmental Sciences. $3 676987
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0416
690 $a 0478
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0768
710 2 0 $a University of California, Davis. $3 1018682
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-05B.
790 $a 0029
790 1 0 $a Hamilton, William, III, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3051526