東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Leviathan's angels: Indigenous polit...

Shaw, Karena.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Leviathan's angels: Indigenous politics and the limits of the political.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Leviathan's angels: Indigenous politics and the limits of the political./
作者:	Shaw, Karena.
面頁冊數:	348 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-04, Section: A, page: 1310.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International60-04A.
標題:	Canadian Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9927167
ISBN:	0599269340

Leviathan's angels: Indigenous politics and the limits of the political.
Shaw, Karena.

Leviathan's angels: Indigenous politics and the limits of the political. - 348 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-04, Section: A, page: 1310.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Johns Hopkins University, 1999.

The struggles of Indigenous peoples for political subjectivity, specifically in Canada but also more broadly, offer crucial challenges to ongoing debates within contemporary political theory. They especially challenge the framing of debates over issues of identity and difference, and the possibility of developing a more pluralistic understanding of political community. These challenges, I argue, demand a more sustained engagement with sovereignty, and with early-modern assumptions about what constitutes a properly political community expressed in claims about sovereignty.

ISBN: 0599269340Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020605
Canadian Studies.

Leviathan's angels: Indigenous politics and the limits of the political.
LDR:03295nam 2200337 a 45 001 933840
005 20110506
008 110506s1999 eng d
020 $a 0599269340
035 $a (UnM)AAI9927167
035 $a AAI9927167
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Shaw, Karena. $3 1257567
245 1 0 $a Leviathan's angels: Indigenous politics and the limits of the political.
300 $a 348 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-04, Section: A, page: 1310.
500 $a Supervisors: William Connolly; Richard Flathman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Johns Hopkins University, 1999.
520 $a The struggles of Indigenous peoples for political subjectivity, specifically in Canada but also more broadly, offer crucial challenges to ongoing debates within contemporary political theory. They especially challenge the framing of debates over issues of identity and difference, and the possibility of developing a more pluralistic understanding of political community. These challenges, I argue, demand a more sustained engagement with sovereignty, and with early-modern assumptions about what constitutes a properly political community expressed in claims about sovereignty.
520 $a Drawing upon early-modern theorists such as Thomas Hobbes and Alexis de Tocqueville, I argue that modern political institutions and practices depend upon sovereignty as their crucial precondition. Sovereignty, in turn, is dependent upon the reproduction of a shared ground of ontological homogeneity—or identity—as the basis upon which disputes can be reconciled and order established. This claim to a necessary sovereignty has not only sustained a high degree of order and stability in the context of North America, but has also legitimated significant violences towards and exclusions of the original inhabitants of North America. Inasmuch as contemporary institutions and practices of politics have assumed and reinforced rather than problematized the necessities that underlie modern productions of sovereignty, they have reproduced a series of double binds for Indigenous political movements. While the work of those theorists who have struggled fiercely against the constraints of modern thought imposed by sovereignty, such as Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, or against the treatment of Indigenous peoples enabled by modern thought, such as James Tully, productively engages challenges posed by Indigenous political movements, even these efforts remain constrained by the limits of political possibility produced by discourses and practices of sovereignty.
520 $a The dissertation begins with an analysis of Hobbes, Tocqueville and the reproductions of sovereignty in the modern scholarly disciplines of international relations and anthropology. It then develops a critical readings of contemporary Indigenous politics in Canada and key texts by Tully and Deleuze-Guattari.
590 $a School code: 0098.
650 4 $a Canadian Studies. $3 1020605
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
690 $a 0385
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0615
710 2 0 $a The Johns Hopkins University. $3 1017431
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 60-04A.
790 $a 0098
790 1 0 $a Connolly, William, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Flathman, Richard, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1999
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9927167