東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Dimensional politics: The Congressi...

King-Meadows, Tyson Demese.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Dimensional politics: The Congressional Black Caucus' coalition building strategy in the budget process.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Dimensional politics: The Congressional Black Caucus' coalition building strategy in the budget process./
作者:	King-Meadows, Tyson Demese.
面頁冊數:	256 p.
附註:	Director: Terry Sullivan.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-03A.
標題:	Black Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3007826
ISBN:	0493173420

Dimensional politics: The Congressional Black Caucus' coalition building strategy in the budget process.
King-Meadows, Tyson Demese.

Dimensional politics: The Congressional Black Caucus' coalition building strategy in the budget process. - 256 p.

Director: Terry Sullivan.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2001.

Despite increases in the Congressional Black Caucus' political clout in the 1980s and 1990s, scholars continued to question why this racially based, bipartisan, informal group of legislators was ineffective in garnering substantial biracial support for its federal budgetary policies outlined in its <italic> Quality of Life Alternative Budgets</italic>. Not only had scholars remarked on the Caucus' evolution past the fiery partisan (and explicitly racial) rhetoric of the Nixon era, other members of Congress and journalists had publicly commended the group's programmatic vision and adherence to fiduciary responsibilities. In the end however, scholars surmised that Congress failed to pass the Quality of Life Budgets due to a combination of factors, including white racism, ideological extremism, or the Caucus' commitment to “black interests” at the expense of other interests.

ISBN: 0493173420Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017673
Black Studies.

Dimensional politics: The Congressional Black Caucus' coalition building strategy in the budget process.
LDR:03698nam 2200313 a 45 001 931759
005 20110429
008 110429s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493173420
035 $a (UnM)AAI3007826
035 $a AAI3007826
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a King-Meadows, Tyson Demese. $3 1255335
245 1 0 $a Dimensional politics: The Congressional Black Caucus' coalition building strategy in the budget process.
300 $a 256 p.
500 $a Director: Terry Sullivan.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-03, Section: A, page: 1194.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2001.
520 $a Despite increases in the Congressional Black Caucus' political clout in the 1980s and 1990s, scholars continued to question why this racially based, bipartisan, informal group of legislators was ineffective in garnering substantial biracial support for its federal budgetary policies outlined in its <italic> Quality of Life Alternative Budgets</italic>. Not only had scholars remarked on the Caucus' evolution past the fiery partisan (and explicitly racial) rhetoric of the Nixon era, other members of Congress and journalists had publicly commended the group's programmatic vision and adherence to fiduciary responsibilities. In the end however, scholars surmised that Congress failed to pass the Quality of Life Budgets due to a combination of factors, including white racism, ideological extremism, or the Caucus' commitment to “black interests” at the expense of other interests.
520 $a Collectively, these accounts of the Caucus' failure to build a majority coalition represent a “Black clientelism politics” explanation, and largely overlook the dynamic nature of causal forces in decision-making environments that foster biracial coalition building. This study contends that the Congressional Black Caucus deliberately constructed a biracial coalition building strategy designed to persuade a cross-section of representatives to support fiscal policies it believed would benefit a wide array of constituents. This “dimensional politics” explanation provides an alternative framework for investigating Caucus behavior and the factors effecting the distribution of support on roll-call votes for the <italic>Quality of Life Alternative Budgets</italic>. The “dimensional politics” explanation incorporates the effects of organizational history, partisanship, and macroeconomic and ideological preferences into inquiries about coalition formation in the arena of budgetary politics.
520 $a Using spatial theory and coalition building theory, I present dimensional politics as a framework for examining support for the <italic>Quality of Life Alternative Budgets</italic>, FY 1982 (97<super>th</super> Congress) through FY 1998 (105<super>th</super> Congress). The study utilizes Census data, economic and informational models of congressional decision-making, spatial positioning (NOMINATE scores), and rhetoric to ascertain the impact of variables commonly associated with support for black interest policies. The study concludes that district demographics, uncertainty regarding the appropriateness and achievability of fiscal objectives, and ideology affected the Caucus' success in minimizing the ‘cost functions’ associated with building biracial coalitions.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a Black Studies. $3 1017673
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies. $3 1017474
690 $a 0325
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0631
710 2 0 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $3 1017449
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-03A.
790 $a 0153
790 1 0 $a Sullivan, Terry, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3007826