東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Pigeonholes and punchcards: Identif...

Miksa, Shawne D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Pigeonholes and punchcards: Identifying the division between library classification research and information retrieval research, 1952--1970.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Pigeonholes and punchcards: Identifying the division between library classification research and information retrieval research, 1952--1970./
作者:	Miksa, Shawne D.
面頁冊數:	167 p.
附註:	Major Professor: Kathleen Burnett.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-06A.
標題:	History of Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3057561
ISBN:	0493729577

Pigeonholes and punchcards: Identifying the division between library classification research and information retrieval research, 1952--1970.
Miksa, Shawne D.

Pigeonholes and punchcards: Identifying the division between library classification research and information retrieval research, 1952--1970. - 167 p.

Major Professor: Kathleen Burnett.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2002.

An author co-citation analysis was undertaken to determine the relationship between library classification research and information retrieval research during the eighteen year time span of 1952 to 1970. The Classification Research Group (CRG) and the Center for Documentation and Communication Research (CDCR), two of the best known research groups in the two areas in question, provided authors to be used in the analysis. A cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters among a sample of twenty-one authors. These four clusters were composed of classificationists, automated retrievalists, theorists, and evaluators of information retrieval systems. Multidimensional scaling placed the authors on a two-dimensional map in accordance with proximity values and revealed either intellectual distance or closeness among the authors. A factor analysis resulted in the twenty-one authors loading on four factors that closely resembled the cluster characteristics with some additional author cross-over among the factors. From this trio of multivariate analyses the two dimensions of the map, the X-Y axes, were determined as use of mechanization (Y) and the conceptual view (X). As clusters move left to right a shift in conceptual view from a holistic to an atomistic overview of information organization and retrieval was observed. The use of mechanization decreases as one moves down the vertical axis. Application of three concepts taken from the theory of normative behavior—social types, worldviews, and information behavior—aided in interpreting the behavioral aspect of the CRG and the CDCR members as revealed by the author co-citation analysis. Future research will include a bibliographic coupling analysis and a complete content analysis of the published works involved. These two analyses will provide further insight into the degree of conceptual similarities and differences between the CRG and the CDCR during the eighteen time period in question.

ISBN: 0493729577Subjects--Topical Terms:

896972
History of Science.

Pigeonholes and punchcards: Identifying the division between library classification research and information retrieval research, 1952--1970.
LDR:02954nam 2200289 a 45 001 930509
005 20110429
008 110429s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493729577
035 $a (UnM)AAI3057561
035 $a AAI3057561
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Miksa, Shawne D. $3 1254069
245 1 0 $a Pigeonholes and punchcards: Identifying the division between library classification research and information retrieval research, 1952--1970.
300 $a 167 p.
500 $a Major Professor: Kathleen Burnett.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-06, Section: A, page: 2034.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2002.
520 $a An author co-citation analysis was undertaken to determine the relationship between library classification research and information retrieval research during the eighteen year time span of 1952 to 1970. The Classification Research Group (CRG) and the Center for Documentation and Communication Research (CDCR), two of the best known research groups in the two areas in question, provided authors to be used in the analysis. A cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters among a sample of twenty-one authors. These four clusters were composed of classificationists, automated retrievalists, theorists, and evaluators of information retrieval systems. Multidimensional scaling placed the authors on a two-dimensional map in accordance with proximity values and revealed either intellectual distance or closeness among the authors. A factor analysis resulted in the twenty-one authors loading on four factors that closely resembled the cluster characteristics with some additional author cross-over among the factors. From this trio of multivariate analyses the two dimensions of the map, the X-Y axes, were determined as use of mechanization (Y) and the conceptual view (X). As clusters move left to right a shift in conceptual view from a holistic to an atomistic overview of information organization and retrieval was observed. The use of mechanization decreases as one moves down the vertical axis. Application of three concepts taken from the theory of normative behavior—social types, worldviews, and information behavior—aided in interpreting the behavioral aspect of the CRG and the CDCR members as revealed by the author co-citation analysis. Future research will include a bibliographic coupling analysis and a complete content analysis of the published works involved. These two analyses will provide further insight into the degree of conceptual similarities and differences between the CRG and the CDCR during the eighteen time period in question.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
650 4 $a Information Science. $3 1017528
650 4 $a Library Science. $3 881164
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0585
690 $a 0723
710 2 0 $a The Florida State University. $3 1017727
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-06A.
790 $a 0071
790 1 0 $a Burnett, Kathleen, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3057561