東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A historical/legal analysis and case...

Kraft, Leah Michelle.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A historical/legal analysis and case study of a high school art classroom as a least restrictive environment for students experiencing disabilities.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A historical/legal analysis and case study of a high school art classroom as a least restrictive environment for students experiencing disabilities./
作者:	Kraft, Leah Michelle.
面頁冊數:	363 p.
附註:	Chairperson: Karen T. Keifer-Boyd.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-02A.
標題:	Education, Art. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3005249
ISBN:	0493143645

A historical/legal analysis and case study of a high school art classroom as a least restrictive environment for students experiencing disabilities.
Kraft, Leah Michelle.

A historical/legal analysis and case study of a high school art classroom as a least restrictive environment for students experiencing disabilities. - 363 p.

Chairperson: Karen T. Keifer-Boyd.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas Tech University, 2001.

This study combines the qualitative methodologies of historical/legal analysis and case study design to compare the intent of the least restrictive environment (LRE) mandate of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to its actual practice in a high school art class. The investigation examines the art classroom as a LRE with regard to such stakeholders as: (a) the learners experiencing disabilities, (b) the art teacher, and (c) the art classroom as a whole (including students with “typical” abilities). A theoretical frame including the values of equality, liberty, and efficiency guided data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the relationships and/or disparities that exist between the legal statute's intent and its actual practice.

ISBN: 0493143645Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018432
Education, Art.

A historical/legal analysis and case study of a high school art classroom as a least restrictive environment for students experiencing disabilities.
LDR:03356nam 2200313 a 45 001 930359
005 20110429
008 110429s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493143645
035 $a (UnM)AAI3005249
035 $a AAI3005249
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Kraft, Leah Michelle. $3 1253921
245 1 0 $a A historical/legal analysis and case study of a high school art classroom as a least restrictive environment for students experiencing disabilities.
300 $a 363 p.
500 $a Chairperson: Karen T. Keifer-Boyd.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: A, page: 0426.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas Tech University, 2001.
520 $a This study combines the qualitative methodologies of historical/legal analysis and case study design to compare the intent of the least restrictive environment (LRE) mandate of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to its actual practice in a high school art class. The investigation examines the art classroom as a LRE with regard to such stakeholders as: (a) the learners experiencing disabilities, (b) the art teacher, and (c) the art classroom as a whole (including students with “typical” abilities). A theoretical frame including the values of equality, liberty, and efficiency guided data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the relationships and/or disparities that exist between the legal statute's intent and its actual practice.
520 $a The study demonstrates that the federal regulations, the <italic>State Plan</italic>, and the local school district operating guidelines adhere to the purposes and the letter of the LRE mandate of IDEA as it travels through its various structural levels of implementation. The case study findings, though, evidence some barriers to a truly integrative model of inclusion at the classroom level, one that provides for active participation and maximizes the student's involvement in his/her education. These barriers included the class's exercise of an inclusion-defined-as-proximity paradigm (especially regarding the student experiencing severe disabilities), along with minimal provision for collaboration between the special and art educators in developing successful inclusion strategies. The presence of these barriers precluded, at times, the active participation and involvement of all stakeholders in the art classroom community, thereby affecting the exercise of the values of equality, liberty, and efficiency in the implementation of the LRE mandate.
520 $a The study offers eight recommendations for providing a FAPE in the art classroom as a LRE, one that is aligned with the purposes and intent of IDEA. Among these are increased communication and collaboration between stakeholders, including special and art educators, parents, and instructional aides; fostering of interaction among peers; provision of student empowerment through choice-making; and increased pre-service education opportunities to work with individuals experiencing severe disabilities.
590 $a School code: 0230.
650 4 $a Education, Art. $3 1018432
650 4 $a Education, Special. $3 606639
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0273
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0529
710 2 0 $a Texas Tech University. $3 1017459
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-02A.
790 $a 0230
790 1 0 $a Keifer-Boyd, Karen T., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3005249