東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Technical training program evaluatio...

Twitchell, Skip.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Technical training program evaluation: Present practices in United States' business and industry.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Technical training program evaluation: Present practices in United States' business and industry./
作者:	Twitchell, Skip.
面頁冊數:	152 p.
附註:	Director: James W. Trott, Jr.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International58-09A.
標題:	Business Administration, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9810840
ISBN:	0591614669

Technical training program evaluation: Present practices in United States' business and industry.
Twitchell, Skip.

Technical training program evaluation: Present practices in United States' business and industry. - 152 p.

Director: James W. Trott, Jr.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, 1997.

There is a lack of information on training evaluation. For those studies addressing the amount of evaluation that occurs and in which samples can be identified, the samples are non-random. There have been very few reports on the methods used for evaluation or the reasons why there is so little evaluation.

ISBN: 0591614669Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017457
Business Administration, General.

Technical training program evaluation: Present practices in United States' business and industry.
LDR:03296nam 2200361 a 45 001 929612
005 20110427
008 110427s1997 eng d
020 $a 0591614669
035 $a (UnM)AAI9810840
035 $a AAI9810840
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Twitchell, Skip. $3 1253099
245 1 0 $a Technical training program evaluation: Present practices in United States' business and industry.
300 $a 152 p.
500 $a Director: James W. Trott, Jr.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-09, Section: A, page: 3484.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, 1997.
520 $a There is a lack of information on training evaluation. For those studies addressing the amount of evaluation that occurs and in which samples can be identified, the samples are non-random. There have been very few reports on the methods used for evaluation or the reasons why there is so little evaluation.
520 $a This study used a random sample selected from members of the ASTD professional practice area titled, Technical and Skills Trainers. It can be argued that this is an informed sample involved in a training area that produces objective outcomes and should produce a favorable picture of training evaluation.
520 $a Questions on the survey were based on Kirkpatrick's four Levels of evaluation and gathered information on amount of evaluation, methods used, reasons for not evaluating, organizational training practices, respondents thoughts about the value of evaluation, and demographics. A total of 146 surveys were returned for an overall response rate of 42%, a higher than normal response rate (20-30%) for this type of survey.
520 $a Survey results supported the lack of training evaluation cited in other studies. This study found that technical training managers reported using each of Kirkpatrick's four Levels of evaluation in the following percentage of their courses: Level 1--72.74%, Level 2--47.05%, Level 3--33.73%, and Level 4--20.82%. Level 1 evaluation methods were not surveyed. The most commonly used methods at Level 2 were skill demonstrations and posttest with no pretest, at Level 3 observation and performance appraisals, and at Level 4 productivity estimates, productivity measures, and regulation compliance.
520 $a The results of this study indicate that organizations seldom require training departments to evaluate, training departments do not have the knowledge and skills required to perform evaluations, and the cost of evaluations are seen to outweigh the benefits.
520 $a The only significant correlation between a training manager's perception of the importance of a level of evaluation in demonstrating value to management and the frequency of reporting evaluation outcomes to managers was at Level 1. No significant correlations were found between any of the four Levels and dependency on evaluation for funding.
590 $a School code: 0107.
650 4 $a Business Administration, General. $3 1017457
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Education, Industrial. $3 1017516
650 4 $a Education, Vocational. $3 1017499
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0521
690 $a 0747
710 2 0 $a Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College. $3 783779
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 58-09A.
790 $a 0107
790 1 0 $a Trott, James W., Jr., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1997
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9810840