東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Ethical issues in transplantation: ...

Girod, Jennifer Ann.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ethical issues in transplantation: Making decisions and living with the consequences.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ethical issues in transplantation: Making decisions and living with the consequences./
作者:	Girod, Jennifer Ann.
面頁冊數:	252 p.
附註:	Adviser: David H. Smith.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International61-02A.
標題:	Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9962709
ISBN:	0599668342

Ethical issues in transplantation: Making decisions and living with the consequences.
Girod, Jennifer Ann.

Ethical issues in transplantation: Making decisions and living with the consequences. - 252 p.

Adviser: David H. Smith.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 1999.

This study describes the moral environment in which most decisions about transplantation are wade, including within the bioethics community, the popular media, and the medical professional world. It also examines the Old Order Amish to provide a distinctive perspective on these unique decisions and burdens of care and cost. Both ethnographic and philosophical methods are used to explore these ethical issues. I conclude that the results of the practice of transplantation are ambiguous at both personal and social levels; some individuals return to a healthy and productive life, while others suffer significant morbidity, psychological stress and economic hardships. The practice also requires a great deal of financial and intellectual support at a societal level. Because the Amish have a long history of sacrificing individual freedom for the good of the community, I assumed that the Amish might make socially responsible individual and community allocation decisions and have better systems of care. In fact, however, both Amish and non-Amish Americans have a difficult time giving informed consent when faced, with the possibility of their own or a loved one's death. The Amish are exemplary because they provide comprehensive, lifelong support for those who have received transplants. In light of the ambiguity of the results of transplantation and the ways in which decisions are made about transplantation, I suggest that bioethicists focus more of their energies on better informing the public about transplantation, attending to post-transplant care issues such as economic and practical support, and facilitating more peaceful deaths for transplant recipients when they become unable to speak for themselves.

ISBN: 0599668342Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017756
Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery.

Ethical issues in transplantation: Making decisions and living with the consequences.
LDR:02627nam 2200289 a 45 001 926730
005 20110422
008 110422s1999 eng d
020 $a 0599668342
035 $a (UnM)AAI9962709
035 $a AAI9962709
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Girod, Jennifer Ann. $3 1250313
245 1 0 $a Ethical issues in transplantation: Making decisions and living with the consequences.
300 $a 252 p.
500 $a Adviser: David H. Smith.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-02, Section: A, page: 0640.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 1999.
520 $a This study describes the moral environment in which most decisions about transplantation are wade, including within the bioethics community, the popular media, and the medical professional world. It also examines the Old Order Amish to provide a distinctive perspective on these unique decisions and burdens of care and cost. Both ethnographic and philosophical methods are used to explore these ethical issues. I conclude that the results of the practice of transplantation are ambiguous at both personal and social levels; some individuals return to a healthy and productive life, while others suffer significant morbidity, psychological stress and economic hardships. The practice also requires a great deal of financial and intellectual support at a societal level. Because the Amish have a long history of sacrificing individual freedom for the good of the community, I assumed that the Amish might make socially responsible individual and community allocation decisions and have better systems of care. In fact, however, both Amish and non-Amish Americans have a difficult time giving informed consent when faced, with the possibility of their own or a loved one's death. The Amish are exemplary because they provide comprehensive, lifelong support for those who have received transplants. In light of the ambiguity of the results of transplantation and the ways in which decisions are made about transplantation, I suggest that bioethicists focus more of their energies on better informing the public about transplantation, attending to post-transplant care issues such as economic and practical support, and facilitating more peaceful deaths for transplant recipients when they become unable to speak for themselves.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery. $3 1017756
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Religion, General. $3 1017453
690 $a 0318
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0564
710 2 0 $a Indiana University. $3 960096
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 61-02A.
790 $a 0093
790 1 0 $a Smith, David H., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1999
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9962709